University of Nottingham: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Companies House: PRI/LBG/NSC (Private, Limited by guarantee, no share capital, use of 'Limited' exemption)·Companies House: Royal Charter Company·DfE school register: Higher education institutions·Education·East Midlands·Nottingham
Companies HouseRC000664 ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
13 awarded tenders, 23 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
31 Electrical machinery3 procedures · 27%38 Laboratory, optical and precision2 procedures · 18%48 Software package and information systems2 procedures · 18%30 Office and computing machinery1 procedure · 9%42 Industrial machinery1 procedure · 9%71 Architectural, construction, engineering1 procedure · 9%73 Research and development services1 procedure · 9%85 Health and social work services1 procedure · 9%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 11 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract100%(11 notices)
11 of 11 notices are Contract (100%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Route not published55%(6 notices)
6 of 11 notices are Route not published (55%).Open36%(4 notices)
4 of 11 notices are Open (36%).Selective9%(1 notice)
1 of 11 notices is Selective (9%).
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 11 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philips Electronics UK Limited | 1 | 7.7% | 0 | 2 | — |
| Tesla Engineering Limited | 1 | 7.7% | 0 | 2 | — |
| Zurich Municipal | 1 | 7.7% | 0 | 2 | — |
| CGI IT UK Limited | 1 | 7.7% | 0 | 2 | — |
| Serco Limited | 1 | 7.7% | 0 | 2 | — |
| Risk Management Partners Ltd | 1 | 7.7% | 0 | 1 | — |
| H Tempest Ltd. | 1 | 7.7% | 0 | 1 | — |
| Pearson Professional Assessments Limited | 1 | 7.7% | 0 | 1 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 15% of 13 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 23 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
Recent procedures
Latest 50 of 57 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1457 / ITT / SC - Thin Coil WindingMachines and apparatus with individual functions | Open | 20 Aug 2021 | £220,000 |
| 1586/ITT/SC - Flat Wire Coil Winding SystemMachines and apparatus with individual functions | Open | 29 Jul 2021 | £200,000 |
| Project FusionHotel | Planned | 28 Jul 2021 | — |
| Insurance Services 2021 (Excluding Brokerage)Insurance services | Awarded / complete | 19 Jul 2021 | £6,250,000 |
| Contact Centre ServicesCall centre | Awarded / complete | 13 Jul 2021 | — |
| Curriculum Design & Assessment (CDA)Database and operating software package | Planned | 25 Jun 2021 | — |
| Multi-beam laser Powder Bed Fusion (lPBF) system for metallic powdersMiscellaneous special-purpose machinery | Open | 22 Jun 2021 | £670,000 |
| Taxi and Private HireRoad transport services | Open | 18 Jun 2021 | £1,500,000 |
| Student accommodation, conference administration and Catering bookings SolutionFacilities management software package and software package suite | Planned | 14 Jun 2021 | — |
| The University of Nottingham - Digital PartnerComputer audit and testing services | Planned | 14 Jun 2021 | — |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 18 of 22 published contracts have an end date; 18 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.