University of Plymouth: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

DfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationSouth West EnglandPlymouth, Devon

Official UK PPONPQHL-4825-PGGLWebsiteplymouth.ac.uk ↗

Open now1next deadline 3 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months30-63% vs prior 12 months (82)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot2.550% single-bid · 4 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share7%of 140 awarded procedures · 123 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

140 awarded tenders, 123 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months82 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£14mnet · on 24 of 24 published values · top 5 = 66%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
PDSE Patient Record Management Solution3 Nov 20268d£890,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 112 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(112 notices)
    112 of 112 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published57%(64 notices)
    64 of 112 notices are Route not published (57%).
  • Direct award21%(24 notices)
    24 of 112 notices are Direct award (21%).
  • Limited / restricted13%(14 notices)
    14 of 112 notices are Limited / restricted (13%).
  • Open9%(10 notices)
    10 of 112 notices are Open (9%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2.5moderate · n=450% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 112 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

05 of 112 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

4.7% below estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
THEATRE ROYAL (PLYMOUTH) LTD42.9%3430 Jul 2026
STRATEGIC PEOPLE LTD32.1%33—
TARC SOLUTIONS LIMITED32.1%23—
City Electrical Factors Limited21.4%22—
SANCTUARY MANAGEMENT SERVICES21.4%22—
NATIONAL GRID TELECOMS LTD21.4%22—
First Advantage Europe Limited21.4%22—
Mercury Construction (sw) Ltd21.4%22—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 7% of 140 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 123 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£14mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 24 of 24 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 66%; a further 56 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£319k middle valuerobust · n=24Middle half £162k–£500k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Extension and Refurbishment of Hepworth House to accommodate for the new Centre of Eyecare ExcellenceObedair——£4,580,018 †
Contract for Rolle Building Exterior WorksClassic Builders (South West) Ltd18 Jun 20251 yrs£1,618,252
≈ £1.6m/yr
Renwal of Unit4 Enterprise Resource Planning solution and associated modulesUNIT4 Business Software Limited16 Jun 20265 yrs£1,486,500
≈ £297k/yr
Student recruitment partnership with UCAS MediaUCAS Media Ltd24 Aug 20261.9 yrs£793,931
≈ £414k/yr
Roof Replacement at the John Bull BuildingMERCURY CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH WEST) LIMITED—1.5 yrs£654,474 †
≈ £436k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

97 of 141 contracts carry an end date, 2 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 201 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Maritime Simulation UpgradeAwarded / complete7 Oct 2026—
Research Vessel Charter - AntarcticAwarded / complete18 Sept 2026—
The provision of Ocean Bottom Seismograph (OBS)Awarded / complete4 Sept 2026—
Student recruitment partnership with UCAS MediaAwarded / complete27 Aug 2026—
Theatre Royal Plymouth Graduation Ceremonies (November)Awarded / complete15 Aug 2026—
SparkForms SoftwareAwarded / complete29 Jul 2026—
Direct Award - Software renewal for Core Finance SystemAwarded / complete17 Jun 2026—
Apprenticeship PlatformEducational software packagePlanning12 Jun 2026£120,000
Student Occupational Health ContractEducation and training servicesPlanned27 May 2026£2,000,000
Davy Heat Network ConstructionDistrict heatingPlanned26 May 2026£4,833,333
PDSE Patient Management SystemAdministration software packagePlanning21 Apr 2026£330,000
Staff Occupational Health ServicesHealth and social work servicesPlanning1 Apr 2026£200,000
RFI ID Card ProductionElectronic cardsPlanning13 Mar 2026£100,000
Faculty of Health Student UniformOccupational clothingPlanning27 Jan 2026£500,000
Salesforce Licencing Renewal and additional productsAwarded / complete20 Jan 2026—
Research Finance and Costing SolutionAccounting systemAwarded / complete5 Jan 2026£599,935
In house print capability equipment, software and supportcentral purchasing bodyOffice machineryAwarded / complete23 Dec 2025—
New HDPE WorkboatBoatsPlanning23 Dec 2025£120,000
Renewal and reduction of MFD fleetAwarded / complete23 Dec 2025—
Application PackagingIT services: consultingAwarded / complete23 Dec 2025—

Search all 201 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 97 of 141 published contracts have an end date; 2 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.