Warwick District Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY·ONS register: Local-authority-district·Social housing register: Local authority·NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACY·Local authority·West Midlands·Leamington Spa
Official UK PPONPTRT-4122-VWQGWebsitewarwickdc.gov.uk ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
45 Construction work6 procedures · 55%34 Transport equipment and products3 procedures · 27%43 Mining, quarrying and construction machinery2 procedures · 18%22 Printed matter and related products1 procedures · 9%30 Office and computing machinery1 procedures · 9%31 Electrical machinery1 procedures · 9%32 Radio, television, communication1 procedures · 9%48 Software package and information systems1 procedures · 9%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 11 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract91%(10 notices)
10 of 11 notices are Contract (91%).Framework9%(1 notices)
1 of 11 notices are Framework (9%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open45%(5 notices)
5 of 11 notices are Open (45%).Route not published45%(5 notices)
5 of 11 notices are Route not published (45%).Selective9%(1 notices)
1 of 11 notices are Selective (9%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 11 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kier Construction Ltd | 2 | 28.6% | 0 | 3 | — |
| Harlow Printing Limited | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 9 | 16 Oct 2025 |
| Continuous Dataprint (UK) Limited | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 8 | 16 Oct 2025 |
| Full Spectrum Print Media | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 7 | 16 Oct 2025 |
| ARC-UK TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 6 | 16 Oct 2025 |
| Chetham House Limited T/A SF Taylor | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 5 | 16 Oct 2025 |
| Triple Crown Print | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 5 | 16 Oct 2025 |
| Graphic Arts (Coventry) Ltd | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 4 | 16 Oct 2025 |
7 awarded procedures across 40 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WDC - Responsive repairs and Void maintenance | Jefferies Contractors Ltd | 29 Jul 2026 | 5 yrs · up to 15 yrs | £125,000,000 ≈ £25m/yr |
Recent procedures
Latest 28 of 28 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 17 of 18 published contracts have an end date; 3 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.