Wokingham Borough Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authoritySouth East EnglandWokingham

Official UK PPONPNTM-6852-HGRP

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months70+112% vs prior 12 months (33)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share11%of 53 awarded procedures · 66 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

53 awarded tenders, 66 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1210 within 6 months · 3 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£11mnet · on 21 of 21 published values · top 5 = 88%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 103 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract96%(99 notices)
    99 of 103 notices are Contract (96%).
  • Framework4%(4 notices)
    4 of 103 notices are Framework (4%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published67%(69 notices)
    69 of 103 notices are Route not published (67%).
  • Open23%(24 notices)
    24 of 103 notices are Open (23%).
  • Selective8%(8 notices)
    8 of 103 notices are Selective (8%).
  • Direct award1%(1 notice)
    1 of 103 notices is Direct award (1%).
  • Limited / restricted1%(1 notice)
    1 of 103 notices is Limited / restricted (1%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 103 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

013 of 103 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
MORRIS & BLUNT LIMITED47.5%44—
ICE Creates Ltd11.9%11—
Palladium International Limited11.9%1112 Nov 2025
HAMPSHIRE PARTITIONING CONTRACTS LIMITED11.9%11—
Premier Tech Water and Environment Solutions Ltd11.9%11—
MRI Software Limited11.9%11—
Human Engine LImited11.9%11—
Transport Focus11.9%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 11% of 53 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 66 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£11mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 21 of 21 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 88%; a further 2 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£98k middle valuerobust · n=21Middle half £53k–£322k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Berkshire Connect to Work ProgrammePalladium International Limited12 Nov 20253 yrs · up to 5 yrs£7,666,780
≈ £2.6m/yr
Post-16 SEND Hub for WBCCONTRACT TRADING SERVICES LIMITED—1 mo£1,218,815 †
Windows and Doors Replacement ProgrammeGeorge Jones and Son Limited—7 mo£369,600 †
Loddon Valley Leisure Centre - Re-roof projectAcclaim Contracts Limited—3 mo£350,000 †
C3499-100- Bush walk shop front replacement and repair and PPM workMORRIS & BLUNT LIMITED—6 mo£329,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

58 of 78 contracts carry an end date, 33 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 12 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 164 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Highways H&T Maintenance & ConstructionHighways engineering servicesPlanned5 May 2026—
Toutley DepotStores depot construction workPlanned5 May 2026—
Bridges Short BreaksConstruction work for social services buildingsPlanned5 May 2026—
Wellington RoadResidential homes construction workPlanned5 May 2026—
Woodley Community HubConstruction workPlanned5 May 2026—
Spencers Wood Primary SchoolConstruction work for school buildingsPlanned5 May 2026—
Emmbrook 6th FormBuilding extension workPlanned1 May 2026—
Arborfield Community HubConstruction workPlanned1 May 2026—
Rooks Nest Specialist SchoolSpecial school construction workPlanned1 May 2026—
Out of hours - emergency call centreAwarded / complete29 Apr 2026—

Search all 164 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 58 of 78 published contracts have an end date; 33 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.