Wolverhampton City Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityWest MidlandsWolverhamptonRan 1 procurement for other authorities

Official UK PPONPVBV-7568-LBLL

Open now2next deadline 6 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months126+43% vs prior 12 months (88)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot413% single-bid · 23 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 23 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share9%of 200 awarded procedures · 301 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

200 awarded tenders, 301 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months5330 within 6 months · 20 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£169mnet · on 111 of 146 published values · 35 repeated amounts set aside · top 5 = 65%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

2 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Supply and Delivery of Road Sweeper Brushes6 Nov 202610d£60,000
Emotional Mental Health and Wellbeing Service20 Nov 202624d£2,832,424

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 214 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract90%(193 notices)
    193 of 214 notices are Contract (90%).
  • Framework10%(21 notices)
    21 of 214 notices are Framework (10%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published47%(100 notices)
    100 of 214 notices are Route not published (47%).
  • Open29%(63 notices)
    63 of 214 notices are Open (29%).
  • Limited / restricted19%(41 notices)
    41 of 214 notices are Limited / restricted (19%).
  • Direct award3%(6 notices)
    6 of 214 notices are Direct award (3%).
  • Selective2%(4 notices)
    4 of 214 notices are Selective (2%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 23 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4robust · n=2313% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 25 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

81 daysrobust · n=25
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 214 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

044 of 214 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 23 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=23

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust73.5%4723 Jun 2025
Base 2563%3615 Apr 2026
Nacro42%345 Aug 2025
St Giles Trust42%2414 May 2026
The Haven Wolverhampton31.5%3515 Apr 2026
HILTON MAIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDframework/DPS on 131.5%3315 May 2026
Progress Children's Servicesframework/DPS on 131.5%2313 Feb 2026
Keon Homes Limitedframework/DPS on 131.5%23—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 9% of 200 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 301 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£169mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 111 of 146 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 65%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£100k middle valuerobust · n=111Middle half £44k–£653k; 35 awards with ambiguous equal values within a procedure excluded from both figures.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Drug and Alcohol Treatment and Recovery ServicesNacro5 Aug 20255 yrs · up to 7 yrs£34,872,822
≈ £7.0m/yr
PP17008 - Drug and Alcohol Treatment and Recovery ServiceNacro——£32,983,137 †
CWC23084 Task 7 - Lincoln Green, Bushbury and Wood EndKeon Homes Limited——£20,082,685 †
Hickman Avenue Fleet and Council Service Facility WorksMcPhillips (Wellington) Limited20 May 20261.3 yrs£13,195,823
≈ £11m/yr
CWC23084 - Task 10 Heath TownKeon Homes Limited——£9,365,144 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

195 of 281 contracts carry an end date, 84 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 53 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 359 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Hotel Led Mixed Use Development - Independent Client AdvisorDevelopment services of real estateOpen4 Aug 2026£60,000
CWC25161 - Invitation To Mini Competition (IFC) Domestic Retrofit (Private and Social Sectors)Awarded / complete3 Aug 2026—
Smart energy ConsultantEnergy-efficiency consultancy servicesPlanning28 Jul 2026—
Temporary Accommodation FrameworkFrameworkHealth and social work servicesAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026£25,000,000
CWC26118MW - Personal Safety DevicesAlarm-monitoring servicesPlanning28 Jul 2026£500,000
CWC26086 - EV Minibus (Ernest Bold Centre)Awarded / complete7 Jul 2026—
CWC23084 - Task 10 Heath TownConstruction workAwarded / complete3 Jul 2026—
CWC24128 Alternative Provision Open Framework for Children & Young PeopleFramework4 lotsEducation and training servicesOpen3 Jul 2026—

Search all 359 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 195 of 281 published contracts have an end date; 84 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.