Hutchison Catering Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyGatesheadNorth East EnglandMain market: Catering services

Companies House06482157 ↗

Procedures with an award824 award records · includes panel / call-off entries
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities6named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£2.0mnet · on 6 of 24 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months0no award in the last 12 months · last 2 Jun 2025
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months4end date on 22 of 24 awards · 4 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions4most often Yorkshire and the Humber
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.

An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.

Active awards, plus pending awards whose standstill has ended or was not published.

24 awards (24 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 24 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

5552 Catering services23 awards · 96% · awards naming a lot
5550 Canteen and catering services1 award · 4% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£2.0mOn 6 of 24 award records; the five largest make 95%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£230k inc. VAT, kept apart). Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i

What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

£151k middle valuerobust · n=6
Award vs estimate
i

Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.

Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.

Based on 4 wins in its industry (CPV division 55). Small sample.

A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.

42.2% below estimatemoderate · n=4compared within CPV division 55
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Biddick Academy Catering Services TenderRED BOX CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED——£1,327,800 †
Monkseaton Middle SchoolACE Advice Limited——£170,372 †
Monkhouse Primary SchoolACE Advice Limited——£151,882 †
Riverside Primary SchoolACE Advice Limited——£150,835 †
North & West Yorkshire - Primary School Group Catering TenderRED BOX CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED——£127,404 †

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 8 of 8 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

Yorkshire and the Humber5 procedures · 63%
North West England1 procedure · 13%
East Midlands1 procedure · 13%
West Midlands1 procedure · 13%

Bidding record
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 1 notice names this supplier, covering 3 lots since 1 Sept 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate

Win rate on contract lots
i

How often this supplier wins when it bids.

Won divided by won plus lost, counted per LOT on Procurement Act 2023 notices naming every bidder. Framework places are counted separately.

Real bids, but only where the buyer named the bidders.

0%moderate · n=3Won 0, lost 3 of the contract lots with a published award. A lot is one contest, so bidding for several lots of one notice counts once for each.
Authorities bid for
i

How many public bodies this supplier has bid to.

Buyers on notices that name it as a bidder, win or lose.

1Bid for and never won with 1 of them on contract lots.
NoticeAuthorityOutcomeBiddersPublished
Provision of Outsourced CateringBISHOP BEWICK CATHOLIC EDUCATION TRUSTlost61 Sept 2026

Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Type not classified96%(23 awards)
    23 of 24 awards are Type not classified (96%).
  • Education4%(1 award)
    1 of 24 awards is Education (4%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
RED BOX CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITEDframework/DPS on 1337.5%429 Jun 2024
Crescent Purchasing Consortium Limitedframework/DPS on 1112.5%1423 Sept 2022
ACE Advice Limited112.5%331 Mar 2023
THE MAST ACADEMY TRUSTframework/DPS on 1112.5%17 May 2025
ESPOframework/DPS on 1112.5%12 Sept 2022
The Whitley & Eggborough CP School112.5%12 Jun 2025

Share = of the 8 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

22 of 24 awards carry an end date, 21 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

ContractEndsPublished value
Leeds Diocesan Learning Trust Catering Framework Agreement17 May 2027 estimated£2,025,577
North & West Yorkshire - Primary School Group Catering Tender4 Jun 2027 estimated£127,404
North & West Yorkshire - Primary School Group Catering Tender4 Jun 2027 estimated£98,731
Biddick Academy Catering Services Tender14 Jun 2027 estimated£1,327,800

Recent awards

Latest 24 of 24 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Lot 2 East MidlandsCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£31 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 26 appointed suppliers
Lot 21 North EastCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£25 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 25 appointed suppliers
Lot 22 North WestCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£26 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 26 appointed suppliers
Lot 23 ScotlandCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£13 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 13 appointed suppliers
Lot 29 West MidlandsCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£27 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 27 appointed suppliers
Lot 30 YorkshireCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£25 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 25 appointed suppliers
Lot 32 NationalCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£32 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 22 appointed suppliers
Lot 5 North EastCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£24 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 24 appointed suppliers
Lot 6 North WestCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£36 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 26 appointed suppliers
Lot 7 ScotlandCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£14 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 14 appointed suppliers
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 1 of 24 awards, estimated from the published duration on 21 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.