Soil Engineering Geoservices Limited: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyMain market: Test drilling and boring work

Companies House02727976 ↗

Procedures with an award915 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities4named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£1.8mnet · on 4 of 15 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months5awards · 9 in the prior 24 months · last 6 Sept 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months4end date on 7 of 15 awards · 3 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions3most often East Midlands
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.

An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.

Active awards, plus pending awards whose standstill has ended or was not published.

15 awards (10 for a named lot, 67%, 5 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 15 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

4512 Test drilling and boring work4 awards · 27% · awards naming a lot
4511 Building demolition and wrecking work and earthmoving work8 awards · 53% · 3 awards naming a lot + 5 whole-procedure awards
Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£1.8mOn 4 of 15 award records; the five largest make 100%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£2.6m inc. VAT, kept apart). Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i

What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

£436k middle valuemoderate · n=4
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Thornley and Deaf Hill BoreholesMining Remediation Authority——£850,000 †
Ground Stabilisation Works by Drilling & Grouting-Mining Remediation Authority——£694,664 †
CA18/05485Mining Remediation Authority——£176,348 †
Ground Investigation WorksMining Remediation Authority——£53,087 †

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 9 of 9 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

East Midlands6 procedures · 67%
West Midlands2 procedures · 22%
Scotland1 procedures · 11%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Type not classified80%(12 awards)
    12 of 15 awards are Type not classified (80%).
  • Education7%(1 awards)
    1 of 15 awards are Education (7%).
  • Local authority7%(1 awards)
    1 of 15 awards are Local authority (7%).
  • Other public body7%(1 awards)
    1 of 15 awards are Other public body (7%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Mining Remediation Authorityframework/DPS on 2666.7%126 Sept 2026
Transport Scotlandframework/DPS on 1111.1%19 Dec 2025
High Speed Two (HS2) Limitedframework/DPS on 1111.1%17 Sept 2023
Wolverhampton City Council111.1%124 Mar 2026

Share = of the 9 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

7 of 15 awards carry an end date, 6 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent awards

Latest 15 of 15 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
CA18/05485Mining Remediation AuthorityNot published£176,348 †
from the contract notice
Ground Investigation WorksMining Remediation AuthorityNot published£53,087 †
from the contract notice
Ground Stabilisation Works by Drilling & Grouting-Mining Remediation AuthorityNot published£694,664 †
from the contract notice
Mine Shaft and Shallow Workings Treatment on Stowheath andLoxdaleWolverhampton City CouncilNot publishedNot published
Multi-supplier Framework Agreement for Ground Investigation Works - Lot 2 - greater than GBP 500,000Transport ScotlandNot published£40,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 5 appointed suppliers
Thornley and Deaf Hill BoreholesMining Remediation AuthorityNot published£850,000 †
from the contract notice
Drilling & Grouting with unobstructed Open Access EquipmentMining Remediation AuthorityNot published£9,750,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 2 appointed suppliers
Drilling with Restricted Height / Restricted Access EquipmentMining Remediation AuthorityNot published£9,750,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 3 appointed suppliers
Drilling & Solution Grouting with Restricted Height / Restricted AccessMining Remediation AuthorityNot published£9,750,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 3 appointed suppliers
Scotland East & WestMining Remediation AuthorityNot published£6,500,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 3 appointed suppliers
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 1 of 15 awards, estimated from the published duration on 6 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.