High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)Companies House: Private Limited CompanyGOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public bodyOther public bodyWest MidlandsBirmingham

Official UK PPONPMNV-3857-LNLVWebsitehs2.org.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months6-45% vs prior 12 months (11)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot40% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share19%of 37 awarded procedures · 50 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

37 awarded tenders, 50 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months8none within 6 months · 6 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£238mnet · on 5 of 5 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 17 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract82%(14 notices)
    14 of 17 notices are Contract (82%).
  • Framework18%(3 notices)
    3 of 17 notices are Framework (18%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published47%(8 notices)
    8 of 17 notices are Route not published (47%).
  • Selective41%(7 notices)
    7 of 17 notices are Selective (41%).
  • Direct award6%(1 notice)
    1 of 17 notices is Direct award (6%).
  • Limited / restricted6%(1 notice)
    1 of 17 notices is Limited / restricted (6%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4robust · n=50% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 17 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

01 of 17 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED38.1%23—
Colas Rail Limitedframework/DPS on 125.4%22—
WSP UK Limitedframework/DPS on 125.4%13—
MBKB LTD25.4%02—
ABB Limitedframework/DPS on 225.4%02—
Paragon Education & Skills Ltd25.4%02—
PORR UK Ltd25.4%02—
Ferrovial BAM Joint Ventureframework/DPS on 112.7%14—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 19% of 37 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 50 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£238mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 5 of 5 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£39m middle valuerobust · n=5Middle half £30m–£70m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
London EustonOve Arup & Partner International Limited——£98,000,000 †
Old Oak CommonWSP UK Limited——£70,000,000 †
InterchangeOve Arup & Partner International Limited——£39,000,000 †
Birmingham Curzon StWSP UK Limited——£30,000,000 †
Contruent Enterprise (PRISM) system support (2025)Contruent Ltd22 Apr 20252 yrs · up to 4 yrs£778,344
≈ £389k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

23 of 53 contracts carry an end date, 14 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 81 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
HS2 Land ReferencingLand management servicesPlanning21 Oct 2026£5,000,000
HS2 Residual Works FrameworkFrameworkConstruction workPlanned8 Oct 2026£2,200,000,000
HS2 Partnering ProgrammeArchaeological servicesPlanned25 Sept 2026—
Interim Maintenance Contracts (IMC)AgriculturalPlanned1 Jun 2026£1,034,000,000
Plant MaterialsAgricultural and horticultural productsPlanned27 May 2026£19,000,000
Automated People Mover (APM) InfrastructureConstruction workPlanned26 May 2026£154,000,000
Washwood Heath Depot and Network Integrated Control CentreBallastAwarded / complete21 May 2026£275,000,000
Contracts for Automated People Mover (APM) SystemConstruction work for railways and cable transport systemsOpen11 Mar 2026£270,000,000
ABANDONED - HS2 Supply of Fleet of On-Track Machines Procurement6 lotsCranes for trucksAwarded / complete5 Feb 2026£123,950,617
ABANDONED - Green Assets Maintenance & Management Procurement6 lotsAgriculturalAwarded / complete22 Dec 2025£209,408,000
Phase One Stations: Design Services ContractsArchitecturalAwarded / complete8 Dec 2025—
ABANDONED - Phase One and Phase Two Stations Platform Edge Doors Framework AgreementFrameworkCity railway construction workAwarded / complete31 Jul 2025£93,000,000
High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Phase One Stations - Framework Agreement for Station Control LinesFrameworkAutomatic fare collectionPlanned21 May 2025£22,000,000
Contruent Enterprise (PRISM) system support (2025)Awarded / complete15 May 2025—
High Voltage (HV) Power System for the HS2 ProjectConstruction work for pipelinesAwarded / complete20 Feb 2025—
Railway Systems Procurement for the HS2 Project Third Party Telecommunications SystemsAncillary works for telecommunicationsAwarded / complete14 Feb 2025£81,000,000
Track SystemsFramework4 lotsConstruction work for pipelinesAwarded / complete13 Feb 2025—
NICC Group Training SimulatorSoftware programming and consultancy servicesPlanned10 Feb 2025—
High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Overhead Catenary SystemConstruction work for electricity power linesAwarded / complete6 Feb 2025—
Tunnel and Lineside Mechanical and Electrical (M&E) SystemsCommunications infrastructureAwarded / complete30 Jan 2025—

Search all 81 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 23 of 53 published contracts have an end date; 14 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.