Building demolition and wrecking work and earthmoving work: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 45110000Works · classin Construction & Civil Engineering

Open now58open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months465265 contracting authorities · 908 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot414% single-bid · 66 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 70 lots from 66 competitions run by 58 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 62 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4.5) and 8 from older notices (bids received, middle 2.5).

Last 36 months.

Typical contract value£85,052middle value of 425 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 425 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Deadline to award40 daysmiddle value · 62 awarded procedures
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Based on 62 decided competitions, last 36 months.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Newest open tenders

3 of 58 open for bids now · newest first

See all 58 open tenders →

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Local authorities61%(544 notices)
    544 of 894 notices are Local authorities (61%).
  • Other public bodies17%(156 notices)
    156 of 894 notices are Other public bodies (17%).
  • Central government11%(97 notices)
    97 of 894 notices are Central government (11%).
  • Housing associations3%(24 notices)
    24 of 894 notices are Housing associations (3%).
  • Education & universities2%(22 notices)
    22 of 894 notices are Education & universities (2%).
  • Not classified6%(51 notices)
    51 of 894 notices are Not classified (6%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
Nuclear Restoration Services LimitedOther public bodies2170
Canterbury City CouncilLocal authorities1650
Homes England (the name adopted by the Homes and Communities Agency)Other public bodies16100
Newry Mourne & Down District CouncilLocal authorities15150
City & County of SwanseaLocal authorities1370
Bristol City CouncilLocal authorities1040
NATURAL ENGLAND (Defra Network eTendering Portal)not classified1080
City of Bradford Metropolitan District CouncilLocal authorities961
Stoke on Trent City CouncilLocal authorities920
Medway CouncilLocal authorities851

437 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 709 of 908 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
South East England159 · 22%587%56%
South West England124 · 17%578%56%
West Midlands121 · 17%566%42%
Yorkshire and the Humber117 · 17%585%21%
North West England115 · 16%675%36%
Greater London114 · 16%573%18%
East of England108 · 15%578%35%
North East England98 · 14%577%32%
East Midlands92 · 13%582%27%
Wales (Cymru)73 · 10%387%84%
Scotland39 · 6%———
Northern Ireland14 · 2%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract90%(820 notices)
    820 of 908 notices are Contract (90%).
  • Framework9%(80 notices)
    80 of 908 notices are Framework (9%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system1%(8 notices)
    8 of 908 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (1%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open41%(368 notices)
    368 of 908 notices are Open (41%).
  • Limited / restricted21%(189 notices)
    189 of 908 notices are Limited / restricted (21%).
  • Route not published17%(157 notices)
    157 of 908 notices are Route not published (17%).
  • Direct award13%(119 notices)
    119 of 908 notices are Direct award (13%).
  • Selective8%(75 notices)
    75 of 908 notices are Selective (8%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold24%(81 notices)
    81 of 336 notices are Above threshold (24%).
  • Below threshold76%(255 notices)
    255 of 336 notices are Below threshold (76%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

28 daysrobust · n=201middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (641) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Bids per lot · n=70
i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

  • 1 bid14%(10)
    10 of 70 lots fall in 1 bid (14%).
  • 2–326%(18)
    18 of 70 lots fall in 2–3 (26%).
  • 4–636%(25)
    25 of 70 lots fall in 4–6 (36%).
  • 7 or more24%(17)
    17 of 70 lots fall in 7 or more (24%).
Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £42,600middle value £85,052p75 £271,840
interquartile range of 425 awards · p90 £1,000,000
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 70 lots from 66 competitions run by 58 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 62 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4.5) and 8 from older notices (bids received, middle 2.5).

Last 36 months.

4robust · n=66middle half 2–6
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

286 of 577 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 64 more give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

50%robust · n=577
Bids from SMEs
i

What share of bids come from small and medium firms.

SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.

281 SME bids out of 328, on 65 lots where the buyer published the split.

Last 36 months.

86%robust · n=328
Awards won by SMEs
i

What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.

Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.

241 of 293 awards where the winner declared its size.

Last 36 months.

82%robust · n=293
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

70%robust · n=378winner registered in the delivery region
Winning award vs estimate
i

Do winners come in above or below the buyer’s estimate.

For each lot we compare the published estimate with the award, like for like. Below means the winner was paid less than estimated, above means more.

Based on 100 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 36 months.

2% below the estimaterobust · n=10050 below · 26 above
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

10 of 641 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

2%robust · n=641
Frameworks & DPS: bidders per lot
i

How many companies apply to get onto a framework or DPS here.

Middle value per lot, frameworks and dynamic markets only. Getting onto a panel is not the same as winning work, so it is kept separate.

Based on 33 lots from 16 framework and DPS notices, last 36 months.

Last 36 months.

8robust · n=1639 vehicle procedures · admission to a panel, not a contest

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 658 awards to 464 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 6% of contract awards in the last 36 months

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 276 of 908 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

Proactis / ProContract65 notices · 24%
In-tend Electronic Procurement50 notices · 18% · 4 open
EU-Supply Complete Tender Management34 notices · 12% · 2 open
Sell2Wales27 notices · 10%
Delta eSourcing22 notices · 8% · 1 open
MultiQuote Sourcing Portal20 notices · 7% · 1 open

Open tenders in building demolition and wrecking work…

58 open for bids now · soonest deadline first

All 58 open notices with CPV 4511… →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 4511. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 26 Oct 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.