SWT Ecology Services Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMECompanies House: Private Limited CompanySurreyNationwide (UK)Main market: Environmental management

Companies House11034197 ↗

Procedures with an award44 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities3named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Last 12 months3awards · 0 in the prior 24 months · last 14 Sept 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1end date on 3 of 4 awards
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions2most often South East England
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.

An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.

Active awards, plus pending awards whose standstill has ended or was not published.

4 awards (4 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 4 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

9071 Environmental management3 awards · 75% · awards naming a lot
7931 Market research services1 award · 25% · awards naming a lot

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 4 of 4 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

South East England3 procedures · 75%
South West England1 procedure · 25%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Other public body50%(2 awards)
    2 of 4 awards are Other public body (50%).
  • Local authority25%(1 award)
    1 of 4 awards is Local authority (25%).
  • Type not classified25%(1 award)
    1 of 4 awards is Type not classified (25%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
South Downs National Park Authorityframework/DPS on 2250%220 Mar 2026
Forestry Englandframework/DPS on 1125%115 Dec 2020
Surrey County Council125%114 Sept 2026

Share = of the 4 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

3 of 4 awards carry an end date · not a retender forecast

ContractEndsPublished value
SCC - EK - RFQ - Ecology Support31 Mar 2028£39,858

Recent awards

Latest 4 of 4 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
SCC - EK - RFQ - Ecology SupportSurrey County CouncilNot publishedNot published
Specialist Planning Advice: Ecology Sussex area of South Downs National ParkSouth Downs National Park AuthorityNot published£61,600 †
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
FRAMEWORK For the provision of Specialist Planning Avice: Ecology (Hampshire area of the South Downs National Park)South Downs National Park AuthorityNot publishedNot published
Terrestrial InvertebratesForestry EnglandNot published£20,000 †
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 3 of 4 awards, estimated from the published duration on 0 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.