Official UK procurement notice
HMCTS Legacy Archive Recovery and Digitisation
Authority: Ministry of Justice (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThe Ministry of Justice, through His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS), is undertaking preliminary market engagement to support consideration of a potential legacy archive recovery and digitisation requirement relating to historic index records currently held on obsolete media.
HMCTS holds a substantial archive of historic index records, primarily across microfiche and cassette media. The current estimated scope includes approximately 20,000 microfiche sheets containing around 2 million records, and 658 cassette media units containing around 6.5 million records. The total estimated archive is therefore approximately 8.5 million records. There are also historic records held in books, although these are currently considered lower volume and lower priority than the microfiche and cassette records.
The current arrangements rely on legacy physical and digital media, manual search activity, local operational knowledge and ageing technology. This creates challenges around retrieval speed, consistency, resilience, future access, preservation and the continued availability of the underlying information. HMCTS is therefore exploring market capability that could support the controlled recovery, digitisation, extraction, validation, indexing and searchability of these historic records.
The purpose of this Request for Information (RFI) is to improve HMCTS’ understanding of market capability relating to:
- inventory, cataloguing and condition assessment of microfiche and cassette media;
- technical discovery of cassette formats, data structures, hardware or software dependencies and recoverability;
- high-resolution microfiche digitisation;
- recovery and extraction of data from cassette media;
- image enhancement, OCR, intelligent data extraction and confidence scoring;
- creation of a common target data model across recovered and digitised records;
- validation, de-duplication, exception handling and quality assurance;
- secure repository and search capability, including access controls, audit logging and reporting;
- service transition, user guidance, business change and benefits tracking.
Through this RFI, HMCTS is seeking to better understand:
- available market capability and supplier capacity;
- how relevant services are normally delivered, for example through specialist digitisation services, legacy media recovery, data extraction, repository/search solutions, managed technical services, consultancy, integration support or mixed delivery models;
- indicative discovery, pilot, implementation and delivery approaches;
- potential commercial models, procurement routes and phasing options;
- legal, data protection, security, records management and information assurance considerations;
- indicative costs, cost drivers, timescales, dependencies and delivery risks;
- the extent to which existing storage, records management or archive services could support or influence a future delivery route.
This RFI is deliberately focused on market capability, technical feasibility and delivery evidence. HMCTS is not asking suppliers to design the future service or make policy, legal, retention, disposal or public access decisions at this stage. Any future capability would need to operate within appropriate HMCTS governance, records management, data protection, security, information assurance, auditability and access control arrangements.
This RFI is an evidence-gathering activity only. It is not a request for a quotation, proposal or tender, and it should not be treated as a commitment to any future procurement. The issuing of this RFI does not commit HMCTS or MoJ to procure any services, software, data platforms or solutions; does not indicate any supplier preference; and does not create exclusivity or advantage for suppliers who respond.
Responses will be used solely to inform HMCTS’ understanding of the market, possible future delivery options, recoverability of legacy media, business case development, affordability, assurance considerations, commercial strategy and potential next-stage routes.
CPV: Archiving services · Computer archiving services · Data management services · Data-processing services · Document management services · Document management system · Information technology services · Optical-character-recognition (OCR) software package · Scanning services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Ministry of Justice buys System and support services (CPV 7225), and who usually turns up
Ministry of Justice’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: System and support services (CPV 7225) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in Greater London (authority’s region).
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 47 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Missing bid counts may hide more single-bid awards. This share is a minimum.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid7% / 22%
2–357% / 44%
4–623% / 17%
7+14% / 17%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate56% / 50%
Within ±2%30% / 20%
Above estimate15% / 30%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 4831No real estimate
This lot is listed as CPV 4831. The table above uses the notice category.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 54 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid22%
2–320%
4–641%
7+17%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 25 Sept 2026, 10:30 BST
- Last source update
- 25 Sept 2026, 10:30 BST
- Authority reference
prj_18400- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-090859- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Not published
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-077a37Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
25 Sept 2026 → 5 Apr 2027 · 3 dates- Planning notice published32 days ago25 Sept 2026, 10:30 BST
- Today28 Oct 2026
- Market engagementin 2 days30 Oct 2026, 23:59 GMT
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ), through His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS), is interested in understanding the market’s capacity and capability to support the potential recovery, digitisation, extraction, validation, indexing and searchability of historic records currently held on legacy media, including microfiche and cassette media. The purpose of this notice is to enable suppliers to respond to the RFI.
Interested parties are required to complete the following actions:
- Register for an account through the MoJ Sourcing Portal at ministryofjusticecommercial.bravosolution.co.uk ↗
- Navigate to the left side menu and click on 'PQQs Open to All Suppliers' > find and click on 'PQQ_628 HMCTS Legacy Archive Recovery and Digitisation Request for Information’ - No response is required at this stage other than expressing an interest to access the RFI documentation and questionnaire.
- Suppliers must express an interest by clicking 'Express interest' and will then be able to view the detail relating to market engagement. The questionnaire is located in the Technical Response section of the PQQ. Please return responses or questions via the messaging function.
Indicative timeline
25th September 2026 (Questionnaire issued and UK2 notice published)
22nd October 2026 deadline for final clarification questions
30th October 2026 (Deadline to submit responses to questionnaire)
The PQQ_628 HMCTS Legacy Archive Recovery and Digitisation Request for Information is being used as a mechanism for the RFI and no feedback or responses to engagement will affect your ability to tender for contracts in the future. Responses are not evaluated. Nothing in this notice constitutes a commitment by HMCTS or MoJ to commence a procurement or award a contract.
Suppliers are responsible for all costs associated with preparing and submitting a response. HMCTS and MoJ will not reimburse any costs incurred through participation in this market engagement. Suppliers should base their responses on the information reasonably available to them at the time of submission. The Engagement deadline in this notice reflects the closing date for questionnaire submission by Suppliers.
- Contract startsin 158 days5 Apr 2027, 00:00 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published25 Sept 2026, 10:30 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender