Systems and technical consultancy services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 72220000Services · classin IT Services & Software

Open now47open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months832379 contracting authorities · 1,837 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot413% single-bid · 127 procedures, 36 months
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 135 lots from 127 competitions run by 101 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 70 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4) and 65 from older notices (bids received, middle 4).

Last 36 months.

Typical contract value£107,162middle value of 807 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 807 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Deadline to award48 daysmiddle value · 73 awarded procedures
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Based on 73 decided competitions, last 36 months.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Newest open tenders

3 of 47 open for bids now · newest first

See all 47 open tenders →

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Central government38%(673 notices)
    673 of 1,764 notices are Central government (38%).
  • Local authorities24%(429 notices)
    429 of 1,764 notices are Local authorities (24%).
  • Other public bodies17%(304 notices)
    304 of 1,764 notices are Other public bodies (17%).
  • Education & universities7%(116 notices)
    116 of 1,764 notices are Education & universities (7%).
  • Police, fire & emergency3%(58 notices)
    58 of 1,764 notices are Police, fire & emergency (3%).
  • Not classified10%(184 notices)
    184 of 1,764 notices are Not classified (10%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
Ministry of DefenceCentral government47160
ENVIRONMENT AGENCYOther public bodies29200
National Highways LimitedCentral government23160
NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITEDCentral government2160
Scottish GovernmentCentral government2130
Secretary of State for Health and Social Care acting as part of the Crown through UK Health Security AgencyCentral government2160
British CouncilLocal authorities19120
Essex County CouncilLocal authorities1990
Home OfficeCentral government1980
DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRSCentral government18120

703 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 1,020 of 1,837 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
Greater London246 · 24%441%47%
South East England211 · 21%547%22%
North West England200 · 20%452%20%
West Midlands183 · 18%448%14%
East of England181 · 18%459%13%
South West England177 · 17%355%4%
North East England168 · 16%343%5%
Yorkshire and the Humber168 · 16%456%12%
East Midlands145 · 14%447%11%
Scotland144 · 14%648%40%
Wales (Cymru)95 · 9%347%24%
Northern Ireland30 · 3%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract91%(1,668 notices)
    1,668 of 1,837 notices are Contract (91%).
  • Framework9%(158 notices)
    158 of 1,837 notices are Framework (9%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system1%(11 notices)
    11 of 1,837 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (1%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published24%(437 notices)
    437 of 1,837 notices are Route not published (24%).
  • Open24%(437 notices)
    437 of 1,837 notices are Open (24%).
  • Direct award22%(412 notices)
    412 of 1,837 notices are Direct award (22%).
  • Limited / restricted19%(357 notices)
    357 of 1,837 notices are Limited / restricted (19%).
  • Selective11%(194 notices)
    194 of 1,837 notices are Selective (11%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold73%(262 notices)
    262 of 361 notices are Above threshold (73%).
  • Below threshold27%(99 notices)
    99 of 361 notices are Below threshold (27%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

30 daysrobust · n=211middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (1,088) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Bids per lot · n=135
i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

  • 1 bid13%(18)
    18 of 135 lots fall in 1 bid (13%).
  • 2–333%(44)
    44 of 135 lots fall in 2–3 (33%).
  • 4–624%(33)
    33 of 135 lots fall in 4–6 (24%).
  • 7 or more30%(40)
    40 of 135 lots fall in 7 or more (30%).
Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £46,117middle value £107,162p75 £353,755
interquartile range of 807 awards · p90 £1,856,786
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for a lot here.

The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 135 lots from 127 competitions run by 101 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 70 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4) and 65 from older notices (bids received, middle 4).

Last 36 months.

4robust · n=127middle half 3–7
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

324 of 981 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 107 more give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

33%robust · n=981
Bids from SMEs
i

What share of bids come from small and medium firms.

SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.

489 SME bids out of 678, on 116 lots where the buyer published the split.

Last 36 months.

72%robust · n=678
Awards won by SMEs
i

What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.

Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.

291 of 622 awards where the winner declared its size.

Last 36 months.

47%robust · n=622
Won locally
i

How much work here goes to companies based in the region.

Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

41%robust · n=471winner registered in the delivery region
Winning award vs estimate
i

Do winners come in above or below the buyer’s estimate.

For each lot we compare the published estimate with the award, like for like. Below means the winner was paid less than estimated, above means more.

Based on 96 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 36 months.

1% below the estimaterobust · n=9640 below · 13 above
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

18 of 1,088 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

2%robust · n=1,088
Frameworks & DPS: bidders per lot
i

How many companies apply to get onto a framework or DPS here.

Middle value per lot, frameworks and dynamic markets only. Getting onto a panel is not the same as winning work, so it is kept separate.

Based on 34 lots from 21 framework and DPS notices, last 36 months.

Last 36 months.

7robust · n=2179 vehicle procedures · admission to a panel, not a contest

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 1,378 awards to 998 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 4% of contract awards in the last 36 months

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 389 of 1,837 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

Public Contracts Scotland (PCS)62 notices · 16% · 2 open
JAGGAER / BravoSolution58 notices · 15%
In-tend Electronic Procurement52 notices · 13% · 4 open
Delta eSourcing44 notices · 11% · 1 open
Sell2Wales42 notices · 11%
Proactis / ProContract34 notices · 9% · 1 open
EU-Supply Complete Tender Management22 notices · 6% · 4 open

Open tenders in systems and technical consultancy…

47 open for bids now · soonest deadline first

NoticeAuthorityDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Support for CEC Digital Products2 lotsThe Careers and Enterprise Company27 Oct 20261d£15,600,000
Investment Appraisal and Proposition Development SupportYork and North Yorkshire Combined Authority28 Oct 20262d£190,000
SPS-02319 Prisoner Records 2 (PR2) – Technical ChangeScottish Prison Service2 Nov 20267d—
ITT (CF) - Digital Preservation System - UID 226MHistoric England4 Nov 20269d£1,160,000
Jisc Google for Education Reseller Framework AgreementFrameworkJisc Services Limited4 Nov 20269d£20,000,000 ceiling
Bwrdd Partneriaeth Rhanbarthol Plant Gogledd Cymru: Adolygiad Gwasanaethau Plant./ North Wales Children's Regional Partnership Board: Childrens Service Review.Denbighshire County Council4 Nov 20269d£120,000
Digital Transformation and Research & Innovation Consultancy Open FrameworkFramework2 lotsJisc5 Nov 202610d£1,000,000 ceiling
CA18/5956 Construction, Environmental & Technical Professional Services Framework (CETPS)Framework4 lotsMining Remediation Authority6 Nov 202611d£9,400,000 ceiling
ICT Data Platform Consultancy ServicesAyrshire College11 Nov 202616d£200,000
Programme Management PlatformCheshire west and Chester Borough Council12 Nov 202617d£400,000
Green Links Study, New Forest National ParkNew Forest National Park Authority16 Nov 202621d£100,000
Procurement of an HR and Payroll SystemLook Ahead Care & Support Ltd20 Nov 202625d£1,500,000
Port of Dover - IT Professional Resource FrameworkFrameworkDover Harbour Board21 Nov 202626d£3,000,000 ceiling
London and Quadrant Housing Trust – Multi-Disciplinary Consultancy Services (Employers Agent, Quality Monitoring and Quantity Surveying) Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS)DPS8 lotsLONDON & QUADRANT HOUSING TRUST7 May 2028559d—
Space Enabled and Geospatial Services Extension NoticeThe Minister for the Cabinet Office acting through Crown Commercial Service10 Feb 2029839d£216,000,000

All 47 open notices with CPV 7222… →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 7222. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 25 Oct 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.