Provider services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition
CPV 72410000·Services · class·in IT Services & Software
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid for a lot here.
The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 35 lots from 32 competitions run by 29 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 17 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 3) and 18 from older notices (bids received, middle 3.5).
i
What a contract here is usually worth.
Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.
Based on 112 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.
Published values, not actual spend.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Based on 20 decided competitions, last 36 months.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Newest open tenders
2 of 5 open for bids now · newest first
| Notice | Authority | Deadline | Days left | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Website redesign and redevelopment | Capital City College | 27 Oct 2026 | 1d | £400,000 |
| Chelmsford College Website tender | Chelmsford College | 6 Nov 2026 | 12d | £50,000 ceiling |
Codes and neighbouring classes
The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division
72413000 World wide web (www) site design services93 notices · 35%72415000 World wide web (www) site operation host services47 notices · 18%72416000 Application service providers38 notices · 14%72411000 Internet service providers ISP21 notices · 8%72414000 Web search engine providers10 notices · 4%72410000 Provider services9 notices · 3%72412000 Electronic mail service provider3 notices · 1%72417000 Internet domain names3 notices · 1%- Systems and technical consultancy services 832 · 12m
- Software-related services 806 · 12m
- Programming services of packaged software products 518 · 12m
- Data-processing services 165 · 12m
- Data services 157 · 12m
- System and support services 148 · 12m
- Software programming and consultancy services 130 · 12m
- Database services 81 · 12m
- Internet services 44 · 12m
- Computer-related management services 43 · 12m
- All of IT Services & Software →
Who buysi
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
i
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name
i
What kinds of public bodies buy here.
Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.
Central government29%(76 notices)
76 of 261 notices are Central government (29%).Local authorities26%(69 notices)
69 of 261 notices are Local authorities (26%).Education & universities17%(45 notices)
45 of 261 notices are Education & universities (17%).Other public bodies14%(37 notices)
37 of 261 notices are Other public bodies (14%).Housing associations2%(5 notices)
5 of 261 notices are Housing associations (2%).Not classified11%(29 notices)
29 of 261 notices are Not classified (11%).
| Contracting authority | Type | Notices | Last 12 months | Open now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ministry of Defence | Central government | 12 | 2 | 0 |
| Norfolk County Council | Local authorities | 9 | 1 | 0 |
| British Library Board | Central government | 5 | 4 | 0 |
| Peabody Trust Ltd | Other public bodies | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| British Council | Local authorities | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Jisc | Other public bodies | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| NHS Blood and Transplant | Central government | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| NHS England | Central government | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership-Procurement Services (hosted by Velindre University NHS Trust) | Central government | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Scottish Natural Heritage | not classified | 3 | 1 | 0 |
192 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.
Where the work is deliveredi
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
i
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 149 of 268 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region
| Region | Notices | Bids / lot | SME wins | Local wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater London | — | 71% | 24% | |
| East of England | — | 72% | 6% | |
| South West England | — | 63% | 28% | |
| South East England | — | 80% | 28% | |
| West Midlands | 8 | 77% | 18% | |
| Scotland | — | — | — | |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | — | 85% | 13% | |
| North East England | — | — | — | |
| East Midlands | — | — | — | |
| North West England | — | — | — | |
| Wales (Cymru) | — | — | — | |
| Northern Ireland | — | — | — |
Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.
How it is boughti
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract94%(252 notices)
252 of 268 notices are Contract (94%).Framework6%(15 notices)
15 of 268 notices are Framework (6%).Dynamic purchasing system0%(1 notices)
1 of 268 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (0%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open37%(100 notices)
100 of 268 notices are Open (37%).Route not published21%(55 notices)
55 of 268 notices are Route not published (21%).Direct award19%(50 notices)
50 of 268 notices are Direct award (19%).Limited / restricted14%(37 notices)
37 of 268 notices are Limited / restricted (14%).Selective10%(26 notices)
26 of 268 notices are Selective (10%).
i
How much of this market is above the legal threshold.
Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.
Above threshold48%(30 notices)
30 of 62 notices are Above threshold (48%).Below threshold52%(32 notices)
32 of 62 notices are Below threshold (52%).
i
How long bidders get to respond.
Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.
Competition
Contracts published in the last 36 months (164) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid14%(5)
5 of 35 lots fall in 1 bid (14%).2–337%(13)
13 of 35 lots fall in 2–3 (37%).4–69%(3)
3 of 35 lots fall in 4–6 (9%).7 or more40%(14)
14 of 35 lots fall in 7 or more (40%).
i
The usual range of contract values here.
The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.
Published values, not actual spend.
i
How many companies usually bid for a lot here.
The middle value of the bid counts that award notices publish, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 35 lots from 32 competitions run by 29 buyers, last 36 months. A buyer with many similar contests counts only up to a limit. 17 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 3) and 18 from older notices (bids received, middle 3.5).
i
How much of this market is actually put out to competition.
Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.
68 of 144 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 20 more give no procedure and are left out.
i
What share of bids come from small and medium firms.
SME bids divided by all bids, on lots where the buyer published the split.
195 SME bids out of 276, on 32 lots where the buyer published the split.
i
What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.
Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.
55 of 82 awards where the winner declared its size.
i
How much work here goes to companies based in the region.
Contract awards where the winner’s registered address is in this region, out of awards where the address is known.
Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.
i
Do winners come in above or below the buyer’s estimate.
For each lot we compare the published estimate with the award, like for like. Below means the winner was paid less than estimated, above means more.
Based on 24 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 36 months.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
i
How often a tender ends with no award.
Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.
12 of 164 notices, last 36 months.
Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.
Who winsi
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 179 awards to 147 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 12% of contract awards in the last 36 months
| Supplier | Procedures | Awards | Last 12 months | Buyers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manifesto Digital Limited | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Numiko Ltd | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Zengenti Limited | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Squiz UK Ltd | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 6B Digital Limited | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Glide Student & Residential Limited | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Q42 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Softcat Plc | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Where to submiti
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
i
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 83 of 268 notices name one · each portal page explains registration
Open tenders in provider services
5 open for bids now · soonest deadline first
| Notice | Authority | Deadline | Days left | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Website redesign and redevelopment | Capital City College | 27 Oct 2026 | 1d | £400,000 |
| Chelmsford College Website tender | Chelmsford College | 6 Nov 2026 | 12d | £50,000 ceiling |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 7241. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 23 Oct 2026.
- Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
- Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.