Basildon Borough Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Royal Charter CompanyNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityEast of EnglandBasildon

Official UK PPONPVJC-8287-HXYT

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months6+50% vs prior 12 months (4)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot60% single-bid · 4 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share33%of 15 awarded procedures · 16 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

15 awarded tenders, 16 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Published award value, 24m£26mnet · on 5 of 5 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 10 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(10 notices)
    10 of 10 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open60%(6 notices)
    6 of 10 notices are Open (60%).
  • Route not published30%(3 notices)
    3 of 10 notices are Route not published (30%).
  • Limited / restricted10%(1 notice)
    1 of 10 notices is Limited / restricted (10%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

6moderate · n=40% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

53 daysmoderate · n=3
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 10 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

0.55 of 10 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
RJ Lift Services Limited320%03—
Architecture 0016.7%1128 Sept 2026
AMALGAMATED LIFTS LIMITED16.7%11—
Sports & Leisure Management Ltd16.7%11—
Avid Insurance Services Limited16.7%11—
Thistle Insurance Services Limited16.7%1117 Mar 2026
Waste-A-Way Recycling Limited16.7%02—
Ward Arboriculture Limitedframework/DPS on 116.7%01—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 33% of 15 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 16 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£26mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 5 of 5 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£600k middle valuerobust · n=5Middle half £500k–£6.5m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Change in Delivery Model for Council Owned Leisure Centres - Agency ModelSports & Leisure Management Ltd——£18,664,434 †
Leasehold Property Insurance Basildon Council & Sempra HomesAvid Insurance Services Limited——£6,451,066 †
Tenants Contents Insurance Including Broker ServicesThistle Insurance Services Limited17 Mar 20262 yrs · up to 4 yrs£600,000
≈ £300k/yr
Commercial Building RetrofitArchitecture 0028 Sept 20267 mo · up to 1 yrs£500,000
Lift Maintenance ServicesAMALGAMATED LIFTS LIMITED——£242,680 †

Recent procedures

Latest 47 of 47 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Consultancy Framework Agreements - Multi-Disciplinary Services Tender for Basildon Borough CouncilFramework3 lotsArchitecturalOpen3 Nov 2021£10,000,000
Lift Maintenance ServicesLift-maintenance servicesAwarded / complete7 Jun 2021—
Lift Maintenance ServicesLift-maintenance servicesAwarded / complete7 Jun 2021—
Lift Maintenance ServicesLift-maintenance servicesAwarded / complete7 Jun 2021—
Fire Safety Maintenance and Emergency Alarm Equipment Servicing & RepairsFire-alarm systemsAwarded / complete20 Apr 2021—
Burnt Mills Road - Housing ConstructionBuilding construction workOpen7 Apr 2021£7,000,000
Provision of Services for Leasehold Right to Buy Property (excluding provision of insurance broker services)Contractor's all-risk insurance servicesAwarded / complete25 Mar 2021—

Search all 47 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 9 of 15 published contracts have an end date; 9 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.