Dixons Academies Charitable Trust Ltd: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LBG/NSC (Private, Limited by guarantee, no share capital, use of 'Limited' exemption)DfE school register: Free schoolsEducationYorkshire and the HumberBradford

Official UK PPONPXTQ-9233-DMJNWebsitedixonska.com ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months4-67% vs prior 12 months (12)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share26%of 23 awarded procedures · 22 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

23 awarded tenders, 22 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months11none within 6 months · 9 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£356knet · on 6 of 6 published values · top 5 = 93%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 16 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract94%(15 notices)
    15 of 16 notices are Contract (94%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system6%(1 notices)
    1 of 16 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (6%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published31%(5 notices)
    5 of 16 notices are Route not published (31%).
  • Limited / restricted25%(4 notices)
    4 of 16 notices are Limited / restricted (25%).
  • Open25%(4 notices)
    4 of 16 notices are Open (25%).
  • Direct award13%(2 notices)
    2 of 16 notices are Direct award (13%).
  • Selective6%(1 notices)
    1 of 16 notices are Selective (6%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

7indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 16 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

03 of 16 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Phoenix Software Ltd28.7%226 Aug 2025
Bidfood28.7%04—
Model Farm Shop Ltd28.7%02—
Drax Energy Solutions Limitedframework/DPS on 114.3%12—
CRESCENT PURCHASING LIMITED14.3%113 Nov 2025
PRIMARY TECHNOLOGY LIMITED14.3%11—
Aquatrust Water and Ventilation Ltd14.3%11—
BHP LLP14.3%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 26% of 23 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 22 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£356kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 6 of 6 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 93%; a further 6 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£47k middle valuerobust · n=6Middle half £31k–£55k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Dixons Academies Trust - Legionella and Water Hygiene ServicesAquatrust Water and Ventilation Ltd—5 yrs£152,524 †
≈ £31k/yr
Consultancy - FabricPhoenix Software Ltd6 Aug 20253 mo£56,550
Dixons Academies Trust - External AuditBHP LLP——£51,589 †
Consultancy - FabricPhoenix Software Ltd——£42,495 †
Painting WorksAlfred Bagnall & Sons (North West) Limited——£27,126 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

22 of 26 contracts carry an end date, 16 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

ContractHolderEndsPublished value
Stategy SoftwareLeadr Technologies Inc31 Aug 2027£82,000
Student & Staff Survey SoftwareLattice30 Sept 2027£63,610
Lot 1 - Dry FoodsBidfood20 Mar 2028 estimated£385,968
Lot 2 - Frozen FoodsBidfood20 Mar 2028 estimated£713,405
Lot 3 - Frozen Breaded ChickenBidfood20 Mar 2028 estimated£270,447
Dixons Academies Trust - The Supply of Fresh Meat & Poultry – ITTModel Farm Shop Ltd24 Mar 2028 estimated£100
Fresh Fruit & VegetablesBidfood6 Apr 2028 estimated£100
Dairy ProductsClegg's Chilled Food Service6 Apr 2028 estimated£100
Lot 1 - Fresh SandwichesTIFFIN SANDWICHES LIMITED20 Apr 2028 estimated£100
Lot 2 - Soft DrinksJ L Brooks20 Apr 2028 estimated£100

Soonest 10 of 11 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 27 of 27 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Dixons Academies Trust - Legionella and Water Hygiene ServicesAwarded / complete23 Jun 2026—
Painting WorksAwarded / complete10 Nov 2025—
Asbestos Remediation WorkAwarded / complete10 Nov 2025—
Procurement SupportAwarded / complete10 Nov 2025—
Dixons Academies Trust - Painting TenderPainting workOpen4 Nov 2025£450,000
Student & Staff Survey SoftwareAwarded / complete11 Sept 2025—
Stategy SoftwareAwarded / complete9 Sept 2025—
Purchase of LaptopsAwarded / complete9 Sept 2025—
CA15579 - Dixons Academies Trust - Strategy SoftwareIT software packageAwarded / complete5 Sept 2025£100,000
Dixons Academies Trust - Classroom and Office SuppliesOffice suppliesOpen5 Sept 2025£3,000,000
Consultancy - FabricAwarded / complete13 Aug 2025—
Sparx MathsAwarded / complete8 Aug 2025—
Consultancy - FabricSoftware consultancy servicesAwarded / complete7 Aug 2025—
Non-half Hourly and Half Hourly Electricity Supply Contract via Inenco NTW NHS Trust DPSDPS2 lotsElectricityAwarded / complete31 Jul 2025—
Signage and ArtworkAwarded / complete29 Jul 2025—
Dixons Academies Trust - External AuditAuditing servicesAwarded / complete28 May 2025£310,000
Dixons Academies Trust - Grounds Maintenance Services2 lotsGrounds maintenance servicesAwarded / complete24 Oct 2024—
Dixons Academies Trust - Mechanical & Electrical Plant Maintenance Services2 lotsMechanical and electrical engineering servicesAwarded / complete24 Oct 2024—
Dixons Academies Trust - Office SuppliesFrameworkEducation and training servicesAwarded / complete20 Nov 2023—
DIXONS ACADEMIES TRUST - EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAMME AND EMPLOYEE HEALTHCARE CASH PLANCompany health servicesAwarded / complete13 Nov 2023—

Search all 27 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 22 of 26 published contracts have an end date; 16 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.