Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityEast MidlandsHinckley

Official UK PPONPTDW-2516-ZHLTWebsitehinckley-bosworth.gov.uk ↗

Open now1next deadline 30 Oct 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months40% vs prior 12 months (4)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot433.3% single-bid · 3 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Published award value, 24m£1.3mnet · on 6 of 6 published values · top 5 = 99%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 8 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(8 notices)
    8 of 8 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open75%(6 notices)
    6 of 8 notices are Open (75%).
  • Direct award13%(1 notices)
    1 of 8 notices are Direct award (13%).
  • Limited / restricted13%(1 notices)
    1 of 8 notices are Limited / restricted (13%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4moderate · n=333.3% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

26 daysmoderate · n=3
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 8 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

03 of 8 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0.1% below estimatemoderate · n=3

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Russell's (Kirbymoorside) Ltd120%12—
FALCON SUPPORT SERVICES E.M LTD120%117 Oct 2025
GRYPHON EVENT SAFETY AND SECURITY LTD120%112 Jul 2025
Robert Heath Heating Limited120%118 Sept 2025
F.R. Sharrock Ltd120%11—
Lepus Consulting Ltd120%1118 Sept 2025

5 awarded procedures across 6 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.3mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 6 of 6 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 99%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£55k middle valuerobust · n=6Middle half £28k–£357k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
HBBC-1541 Air to Air Source Heat PumpsRobert Heath Heating Limited8 Sept 20256.2 yrs · up to 7.4 yrs£721,753
≈ £117k/yr
Provision of CCTV Monitoring ServicesGRYPHON EVENT SAFETY AND SECURITY LTD2 Jul 20253 yrs · up to 5 yrs£449,482
≈ £150k/yr
HBBC-1547 Landscape Character AssessmentLepus Consulting Ltd18 Sept 20255 mo£80,000
Tractor UnitRussell's (Kirbymoorside) Ltd——£29,600 †
Trailed MowerF.R. Sharrock Ltd——£27,500 †

Recent procedures

Latest 11 of 11 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
SECURITY SERVICES ON BEHALF OF HINCKLEY AND BOSWORTH BOROUGH COUNCILSecurity servicesOpen7 Sept 2026£650,000
REDEVELOPMENT OF PEGGS CLOSE SITE, EARL SHILTONSite-development workOpen3 Sept 2026£3,000,000
HBBC-1541 Air to Air Source Heat PumpsHeat pumpsAwarded / complete13 Mar 2026£1,100,000
HBBC-1567 Further Competition for Grounds Maintenance Machinery for Hinckley & Bosworth Borough Council3 lotsGrounds maintenance servicesAwarded / complete12 Feb 2026—
HBBC-1547 Landscape Character AssessmentUrban planning and landscape architectural servicesAwarded / complete4 Feb 2026£80,000
Homeless Accommodation and Support ServicesAwarded / complete7 Oct 2025—
Provision of CCTV Monitoring ServicesSecurity servicesAwarded / complete23 Sept 2025£540,000
Temporary Accommodation ProposalSocial work services with accommodationAwarded / complete17 Jan 2024—
Contractor for a National Conservation & Science Centre with enclosure at Twycross ZooArchitecturalOpen23 Aug 2023£13,000,000
CONTRACTOR FOR NATIONAL SCIENCE & CONSERVATION CENTRE AT TWYCROSS ZOO (HINCKLEY AND BOSWORTH BOROUGH COUNCIL)ArchitecturalOpen8 Dec 2022£12,000,000

Search all 11 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 3 of 7 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.