The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityLocal authorityGreater LondonKingston upon ThamesRan 7 procurements for other authorities

Official UK PPONPWRN-9366-HZGVWebsitekingston.gov.uk ↗

Open now2next deadline 16 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months62+55% vs prior 12 months (40)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot40% single-bid · 7 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 7 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share16%of 105 awarded procedures · 191 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

105 awarded tenders, 191 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months2613 within 6 months · 6 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£18mnet · on 44 of 44 published values · top 5 = 74%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

2 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
AfC Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Information Advice and Support Services (SENDIASS)procuring entity16 Nov 202618d£1,155,000
Accommodation-Based Supported Living (Acre Road)15 Feb 2027109d£6,150,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 102 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract91%(93 notices)
    93 of 102 notices are Contract (91%).
  • Framework7%(7 notices)
    7 of 102 notices are Framework (7%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system2%(2 notices)
    2 of 102 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published36%(37 notices)
    37 of 102 notices are Route not published (36%).
  • Limited / restricted30%(31 notices)
    31 of 102 notices are Limited / restricted (30%).
  • Direct award16%(16 notices)
    16 of 102 notices are Direct award (16%).
  • Open11%(11 notices)
    11 of 102 notices are Open (11%).
  • Selective7%(7 notices)
    7 of 102 notices are Selective (7%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 7 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4robust · n=70% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 102 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

015 of 102 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimatemoderate · n=3

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
CRAVENCROFT LIMITED65.7%661 Aug 2025
ANA Treatment Centre65.7%26—
Kingston Churches Action on Homelessness (KCAH)54.8%35—
Chawton Hill Associates Limited32.9%33—
Somewhere House32.9%13—
Bosence Farm Community Ltd32.9%13—
Social Care Institute for Excellence21.9%22—
YMCA St Paul's Group21.9%2221 May 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 16% of 105 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 191 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£18mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 44 of 44 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 74%; a further 5 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£72k middle valuerobust · n=44Middle half £30k–£216k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Soft FM ServicesYBC Cleaning Services Ltd——£6,607,919 †
Homeless Hostel/Housing - Emergency Temporary Accommodation Block Bed Contract - Direct AwardYMCA St Paul's Group——£3,951,000 †
Achieving for Children (AfC) -(SEND) Transport ServiceLondon Hire Limited——£1,300,000 †
ASC Integrated Care SystemLiquid Logic Limited——£814,000 †
MHR HR and Finance systemSoftcat Plc——£780,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

73 of 135 contracts carry an end date, 29 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 26 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 167 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

Search all 167 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 73 of 135 published contracts have an end date; 29 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.