London Borough of Croydon: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityGreater LondonCroydon

Official UK PPONPJTH-3594-VXYL

Open now2next deadline 2 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months65+14% vs prior 12 months (57)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot38.7% single-bid · 23 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 23 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share7%of 86 awarded procedures · 119 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

86 awarded tenders, 119 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months238 within 6 months · 14 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£319mnet · on 68 of 68 published values · top 5 = 89%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

2 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Norbury Railway Bridge Art Commission2 Nov 20264d£32,500
Corporate Property, Liability and Terrorism insurance for the Insurance London Consortium (ILC)3 lots6 Nov 20268d£44,100,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 122 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract98%(120 notices)
    120 of 122 notices are Contract (98%).
  • Framework2%(2 notices)
    2 of 122 notices are Framework (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open46%(56 notices)
    56 of 122 notices are Open (46%).
  • Direct award20%(24 notices)
    24 of 122 notices are Direct award (20%).
  • Limited / restricted17%(21 notices)
    21 of 122 notices are Limited / restricted (17%).
  • Route not published16%(20 notices)
    20 of 122 notices are Route not published (16%).
  • Selective1%(1 notice)
    1 of 122 notices is Selective (1%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 23 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=238.7% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 18 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

87 daysrobust · n=18
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 122 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

028 of 122 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 13 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0.2% below estimaterobust · n=13

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
WORK WORKS TRAINING SOLUTIONS C.I.C.22.3%2326 Aug 2026
AECOM LIMITED22.3%2230 Jun 2026
PUBLIC WORKS LIMITED22.3%2228 Jul 2026
BE Inspired Youth & Community CIC22.3%2221 Aug 2026
Change Grow Live Services Limited22.3%12—
Evolve Housing + Supportframework/DPS on 122.3%125 Oct 2026
White Horse Contractors Limited22.3%1222 Jun 2026
CAYSHframework/DPS on 122.3%12—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 7% of 86 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 119 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£319mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 68 of 68 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 89%; a further 2 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£93k middle valuerobust · n=68Middle half £60k–£704k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Children's Residential Home Care ProviderKPMSUK LIMITED12 Oct 20261 yrs · up to 1.5 yrs£182,492,250
≈ £182m/yr
Older People’s Service Care and Support in PFI Care Homes Langley Oaks, Heavers Court and Addington HeightsEleanor Nursing and Social Care Ltd4 Feb 202610 yrs · up to 13 yrs£79,764,876
≈ £8.0m/yr
Microsoft Enterprise Licensing Agreement (E5 Ramp Up) Contract Variation and ExtensionBytes Software Services Ltd——£8,264,293 †
Lot 2 – Inspection, Reporting and Compliance Monitoring ServicesThe Oyster Partnership Ltd13 Aug 20265 yrs£7,069,920
≈ £1.4m/yr
Single Homelessness Supported AccommodationEvolve Housing + Support5 Oct 20267 yrs£5,789,000
≈ £827k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

50 of 71 contracts carry an end date, 27 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 23 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 164 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Creative health intervention for primary-aged children with experience of domestic abuseWelfare services for children and young peopleOpen22 Jun 2026£60,000
For Miss LalaAwarded / complete18 Jun 2026—
Family Hubs Market EngagementHealth and social work servicesPlanning17 Jun 2026—
Young People & CEYA2 lotsAccommodation servicesOpen5 Jun 2026£7,980,000
Housing Out of Borough Relocation Service Pre-Engagement MarketingAdministrative housing servicesPlanning21 May 2026£1,000,000
Collection of Deceased and Delivery to Mortuaries for the South London Coroners Service and Public Health Funerals3 lotsFuneral servicesAwarded / complete18 May 2026£2,250,000
Adult Healthy Behaviours ServiceCommunity health servicesOpen11 May 2026£5,000,000
South Norwood Care Home for children with Complex Needs (Tender)Health and social work servicesAwarded / complete11 May 2026£0

Search all 164 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 50 of 71 published contracts have an end date; 27 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.