London Borough of Waltham Forest: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY·ONS register: Local-authority-district·Social housing register: Local authority·Local authority·Greater London·London
Official UK PPONPPJN-6757-NZZZWebsitewalthamforest.gov.uk ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 7 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
840 awarded tenders, 299 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
Open notices
6 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build
| Notice | Deadline | Days left | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| DESIGN AND PRINT | 30 Oct 2026 | 2d | £1,131,309 |
| Provision of Smoking Cessation Service. | 12 Nov 2026 | 15d | £1,350,000 |
| Provision of a School Improvement Partner | 23 Nov 2026 | 26d | £1,689,720 |
| LBWF Planned works and Repairs Technical Partner 2026 | 4 Dec 2026 | 37d | £312,000,000 |
| Extension of existing Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for the Supply of Temporary Accommodation | 23 Feb 2029 | 848d | £218,750,000 |
| Dynamic Purchasing System for the provision of Specialist Professional Services | 15 May 2034 | 2,756d | £20,000,000 |
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
85 Health and social work services45 procedures · 30% · 1 open45 Construction work28 procedures · 19% · 1 open98 Other community, social and personal services10 procedures · 7% · 1 open71 Architectural, construction, engineering9 procedures · 6%72 IT services: consulting, software, internet9 procedures · 6%80 Education and training services8 procedures · 5% · 1 open79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting6 procedures · 4% · 1 open55 Hotel, restaurant and retail trade services4 procedures · 3% · 1 openHow they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 151 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract92%(139 notices)
139 of 151 notices are Contract (92%).Framework5%(8 notices)
8 of 151 notices are Framework (5%).Dynamic purchasing system3%(4 notices)
4 of 151 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (3%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open40%(60 notices)
60 of 151 notices are Open (40%).Route not published36%(55 notices)
55 of 151 notices are Route not published (36%).Limited / restricted13%(19 notices)
19 of 151 notices are Limited / restricted (13%).Direct award9%(13 notices)
13 of 151 notices are Direct award (9%).Selective3%(4 notices)
4 of 151 notices are Selective (3%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 7 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.
Based on 11 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 152 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leyton Midland Cars | 263 | 31.3% | 0 | 263 | — |
| livingstone health care services | 69 | 8.2% | 0 | 69 | — |
| Supreme Home care | 36 | 4.3% | 0 | 36 | — |
| Vanity care Limited | 34 | 4% | 1 | 34 | — |
| Verrolyne Services Ltd | 33 | 3.9% | 0 | 33 | — |
| Star Care UK Ltd | 31 | 3.7% | 0 | 31 | — |
| City Home Care limited | 29 | 3.5% | 0 | 29 | — |
| Unique Care Uk | 28 | 3.3% | 0 | 28 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 44% of 840 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 299 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Bridge Station Sites - Developer Partner | London Square Developments Limited | — | — | £173,000,000 † |
| Lea Bridge Station Sites - Developer Partner | London Square Developments Limited | — | — | £173,000,000 † |
| Managed Services for Temporary Agency Resources | Matrix SCM | — | — | £108,000,000 † |
| Provision of Extra Care Services within London Borough of Waltham Forest | Chosen Care Group Limited | 17 Jul 2025 | 5 yrs | £12,500,000 ≈ £2.5m/yr |
| Waltham Forest Substance and Alcohol Misuse Service | Change, Grow, Live | — | — | £11,295,000 † |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
98 of 883 contracts carry an end date, 38 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Holder | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Council Chamber AV Works | CIVICO LTD | 31 Oct 2026 | £40,012 |
| Provision of a Befriending Service | Lifeline Community Projects | 31 Dec 2026 | £723,200 |
| Provision of Highways and Lighting Term Contract in the London Borough of Waltham Forest | JB Riney & Co Ltd | 31 Mar 2027 | Not published |
| PAS2161 Highways Condition Survey | Gaist Solutions Limited | 31 Mar 2027 | £35,000 |
| Provision of Adult Learning Subcontracted services | Waltham Forest College | 31 Jul 2027 | £319,680 |
| Meeting Pods | Rainbow Office Design | 10 Oct 2027 | £138,361 |
| Families and Homes Hub Fit-Out | Thomas Sinden Limited | 22 Mar 2028 | £2,487,081 |
| Stronger Together Skills | Creative Engagement Services CIC | 31 Mar 2028 | £100,000 |
Recent procedures
Latest 50 of 974 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 98 of 883 published contracts have an end date; 38 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.