London Legacy Development Corporation: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Other public bodyGreater LondonLondonRan 1 procurement for other authorities

Official UK PPONPHBV-4443-HXBV

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months37+270% vs prior 12 months (10)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot240% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share15%of 40 awarded procedures · 60 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

40 awarded tenders, 60 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months73 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£655mnet · on 21 of 21 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 47 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract81%(38 notices)
    38 of 47 notices are Contract (81%).
  • Framework19%(9 notices)
    9 of 47 notices are Framework (19%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open34%(16 notices)
    16 of 47 notices are Open (34%).
  • Route not published26%(12 notices)
    12 of 47 notices are Route not published (26%).
  • Direct award17%(8 notices)
    8 of 47 notices are Direct award (17%).
  • Selective15%(7 notices)
    7 of 47 notices are Selective (15%).
  • Limited / restricted9%(4 notices)
    4 of 47 notices are Limited / restricted (9%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2robust · n=540% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 9 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

40 daysrobust · n=9
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 47 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

010 of 47 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
EASTSIDE EDUCATIONAL TRUSTframework/DPS on 125%2225 Sept 2026
Urban Movement LIMITEDframework/DPS on 125%2227 Mar 2026
The Elephant Roomframework/DPS on 125%2227 Mar 2026
Norman Rourke Prymeframework/DPS on 125%227 Aug 2026
Malcolm Hughes Land Surveyors Ltdframework/DPS on 125%227 Jul 2026
Buro Happold Ltdframework/DPS on 125%2222 Oct 2026
Spy Studioframework/DPS on 125%2221 May 2026
Ballymore Limited25%12—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 15% of 40 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 60 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£655mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 21 of 21 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%; a further 3 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£150k middle valuerobust · n=21Middle half £93k–£398k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Stratford Waterfront and Bridgewater Modifications to Development AgreementBallymore Limited——£600,000,000 †
Minor Civils WorksKenson Highways Limited21 Jan 20264.8 yrs · up to 6.8 yrs£50,000,000
≈ £10m/yr
Stadium Summer Event FlooringHUGHES SAFETY SHOWERS LIMITED ta Terraplas13 Jan 20262 mo£1,348,043
London Stadium OKI Printers, Support, Toner and Badge StockEAS Technologies t/a Accredit Solutions14 Nov 20254.8 yrs£769,632
≈ £162k/yr
Waterden Green Space for Teenage Girls Design, Fabrication and Installation ServicesYes Make London Limited6 Aug 20263 yrs£600,000
≈ £200k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

30 of 37 contracts carry an end date, 9 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 78 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
MAC-04 QEOP Brand UpdateAwarded / complete21 May 2026—
Opportunity London MembershipAwarded / complete9 Apr 2026—
FirewallAwarded / complete2 Apr 2026—
Music is BlackAwarded / complete2 Apr 2026—
Marketing Advertisement & Creative Services FrameworkFramework2 lotsAdvertising and marketing servicesAwarded / complete2 Apr 2026£50,000,000
Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park (QEOP) Advertising ConcessionAdvertising servicesAwarded / complete2 Apr 2026£150,000
Minor Civils WorksWorks for complete or part construction and civil engineering workAwarded / complete24 Mar 2026£50,000,000
Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Footfall CollectionData collection and collation servicesPlanning19 Mar 2026£150,000
Staffing SystemAwarded / complete9 Feb 2026—
Access Control SystemAwarded / complete20 Jan 2026—
Creative Experience Lab LondonAwarded / complete19 Jan 2026—
Stratford Waterfront Statutory Audit ServicesAwarded / complete19 Jan 2026—
Carpenters Road – Road Safety Audit and Design Review Advisory ServicesAwarded / complete19 Jan 2026—
Stadium Summer Event FlooringAwarded / complete13 Jan 2026—
Engineering, Associated Services & Public Realm and Structures Surveys (E&S)Framework2 lotsArchitecturalPlanned23 Nov 2025£50,000,000
Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park (QEOP) Park Kiosks Commercial LeaseCanteen and catering servicesOpen19 Nov 2025£0
London Stadium OKI Printers, Support, Toner and Badge StockAwarded / complete14 Nov 2025—
Security Services FrameworkFrameworkSecurity servicesPlanning4 Nov 2025£20,000,000
LS026 London Stadium Ticketing SystemEvent servicesOpen23 Oct 2025£1,788,500
Marketing Creative & Advertisement ServicesFrameworkAdvertising and marketing servicesPlanning17 Oct 2025£5,000,000

Search all 78 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 30 of 37 published contracts have an end date; 9 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.