Middlesex University: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

DfE school register: Higher education institutionsCentral governmentGreater LondonLondon

Charity CommissionXN92247 ↗Websitemdx.ac.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months3+200% vs prior 12 months (1)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot325% single-bid · 4 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share30%of 10 awarded procedures · 11 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

10 awarded tenders, 11 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Published award value, 24m£3.6mnet · on 3 of 3 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 4 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(4 notices)
    4 of 4 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open75%(3 notices)
    3 of 4 notices are Open (75%).
  • Selective25%(1 notices)
    1 of 4 notices are Selective (25%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3moderate · n=425% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

87 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 4 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

14 of 4 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

40.7% above estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Selective Travel Management110%1114 Jul 2025
Haysmac LLP110%117 Apr 2026
Amulet (Churchill Security Solutions) Limited110%1125 Jun 2026
Compass Contract Services (UK) Ltd110%1130 Jun 2026
World Travel Centre Ltd110%1114 Jul 2025
HAPLO Service Ltd110%03—
Hybrid News Limited110%01—
Price Waterhouse Coopers LLP110%01—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 30% of 10 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 11 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£3.6mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 3 of 3 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£1.2m middle valuemoderate · n=3Middle half £1.0m–£1.4m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Cleaning & Associated ServicesCompass Contract Services (UK) Ltd30 Jun 20263 yrs · up to 4 yrs£1,540,000
≈ £513k/yr
Security Systems and Manpower ServicesAmulet (Churchill Security Solutions) Limited25 Jun 20263 yrs · up to 4 yrs£1,225,000
≈ £408k/yr
External Audit Services 2026Haysmac LLP7 Apr 20265 yrs · up to 7 yrs£800,000
≈ £160k/yr

Recent procedures

Latest 11 of 11 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Cleaning & Associated ServicesAccommodationAwarded / complete12 Oct 2026£1,200,000
External Audit Services 2026Financial auditing servicesAwarded / complete29 Sept 2026£0
Security Systems and Manpower ServicesRepair and maintenance services of security equipmentAwarded / complete30 Jun 2026£800,000
Travel Management Services 2025Travel management servicesAwarded / complete6 Oct 2025£0
Media Buying ServicesAdvertising campaign servicesAwarded / complete31 Jul 2023—
Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Building Services 2022Repair and maintenance services of electrical and mechanical building installationsAwarded / complete9 May 2022£900,000
CRIS - Current research Information System3 lotsInformation systemsAwarded / complete23 Mar 2022—
Website Content Management SystemContent management software development servicesAwarded / complete23 Mar 2022£400,000
Current Research Information SystemSoftware package and information systemsCancelled4 Nov 2021—
Hendon Hub Project - University sitesConstruction workAwarded / complete30 Jul 2021—
Internal Audit Services 2021Internal audit servicesAwarded / complete10 May 2021—

Search all 11 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 7 of 11 published contracts have an end date; 2 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.