Milton Keynes College: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

DfE school register: Further educationEducationSouth East EnglandMilton Keynes

Official UK PPONPMNN-7576-BCQGWebsitemkcollege.ac.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months12+300% vs prior 12 months (3)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot2.533.3% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share33%of 18 awarded procedures · 16 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

18 awarded tenders, 16 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Published award value, 24m£5.5mnet · on 7 of 7 published values · top 5 = 99%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 15 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(15 notices)
    15 of 15 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open73%(11 notices)
    11 of 15 notices are Open (73%).
  • Route not published20%(3 notices)
    3 of 15 notices are Route not published (20%).
  • Direct award7%(1 notices)
    1 of 15 notices are Direct award (7%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2.5robust · n=633.3% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 6 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

29 daysrobust · n=6
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 15 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

18 of 15 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

13.3% below estimatemoderate · n=3

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Borras Construction Ltd316.7%333 Jun 2026
Macintyre Care211.1%2215 Jul 2026
Spacemaker Developments ltd15.6%1116 Jun 2025
WALNUTS CARE LTD15.6%1115 Jul 2026
SNACKLINE DIRECT LTD15.6%117 Jun 2026
Edison Media Limited15.6%114 Aug 2026
RUBAX LIFTS LIMITED15.6%11—
SOFEA15.6%1115 Jul 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 33% of 18 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 16 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£5.5mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 7 of 7 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 99%; a further 4 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£670k middle valuerobust · n=7Middle half £94k–£1.4m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Bletchley Campus; Salix ProjectBorras Construction Ltd18 Mar 20266 mo£1,876,017
Bletchley Campus; Tariff and Carbon Offset Fund ProjectBorras Construction Ltd29 May 20252 mo£1,733,710
Milton Keynes College Chaffron Way Campus; Tariff Fund ProjectSpacemaker Developments ltd16 Jun 20252 mo£1,048,980
NEET (Not in Education, Employment or Training)Borras Construction Ltd3 Jun 20262 mo£670,190
Milton Keynes College Tender for Supply of Confectionary GoodsSNACKLINE DIRECT LTD7 Jun 20262.6 yrs · up to 4.6 yrs£150,000
≈ £58k/yr

Recent procedures

Latest 26 of 26 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Milton Keynes College Tender for Supply of Confectionary GoodsFast-food productsAwarded / complete12 Oct 2026£450,000
Milton Keynes College Lift Maintenance ServicesLift-maintenance servicesAwarded / complete6 Oct 2026£85,000
Milton Keynes College Marketing and Advertising ServicesAdvertising and marketing servicesAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026£800,000
SubcontractingAwarded / complete24 Jul 2026—
SubcontractingAwarded / complete22 Jul 2026—
SubcontractingAwarded / complete22 Jul 2026—
SubcontractingAwarded / complete22 Jul 2026—
NEET (Not in Education, Employment or Training)Construction work for buildings of further educationAwarded / complete4 Jun 2026£400,000
Bletchley Campus; Salix ProjectConstruction work for college buildingsAwarded / complete19 Mar 2026£1,400,000
Milton Keynes College The Provision of Ground MaintenanceGrounds maintenance servicesOpen25 Feb 2026£200,000
Milton Keynes College Supply of New and Refurbishment or Repair of FurnitureFurnitureOpen9 Feb 2026£200,000
Milton Keynes College Tender for an Approved Supplier List for Mechanical, Electrical & Water Reactive Repair and Maintenance Services3 lotsRepair and maintenance servicesOpen19 Dec 2025£450,000
Milton Keynes College Chaffron Way Campus; Tariff Fund ProjectConstruction work for buildings of further educationAwarded / complete20 Jun 2025£2,500,000
Bletchley Campus; Tariff and Carbon Offset Fund ProjectConstruction work for buildings of further educationAwarded / complete29 May 2025£2,000,000
MKC - Finance system 3 years with option to extend x2 12 month periodsAccounting software packageOpen12 May 2025£500,000
Milton Keynes College (MKC) ITT for Lead Designer/Architect & Planning Retained ServiceArchitectural and related servicesAwarded / complete23 Sept 2024—
Milton Keynes College Open Tender for HR and Payroll ServicesPayroll management servicesAwarded / complete23 Sept 2024—
Milton Keynes College (MKC) ITT for Mechanical & Electrical Consultant Retained ServiceEngineering design services for mechanical and electrical installations for buildingsOpen8 May 2024—
Milton Keynes College (MKC) ITT for Structural and Civil Engineering Consultant Retained ServiceCivil engineering consultancy servicesOpen8 May 2024—
MILTON KEYNES COLLEGE GROUP MANNED GUARDS SECURITY SERVICEGuard servicesAwarded / complete14 Aug 2023—

Search all 26 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 8 of 9 published contracts have an end date; 3 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.