NATIONAL ENERGY SYSTEM OPERATOR LIMITED: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyGOV.UK register: Public corporationOther public bodySouth East EnglandWokingham

Companies House11014226 ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months27+29% vs prior 12 months (21)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share38%of 16 awarded procedures · 16 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

16 awarded tenders, 16 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months4none within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£56mnet · on 12 of 12 published values · top 5 = 78%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 48 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract75%(36 notices)
    36 of 48 notices are Contract (75%).
  • Framework25%(12 notices)
    12 of 48 notices are Framework (25%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published44%(21 notices)
    21 of 48 notices are Route not published (44%).
  • Selective25%(12 notices)
    12 of 48 notices are Selective (25%).
  • Direct award13%(6 notices)
    6 of 48 notices are Direct award (13%).
  • Limited / restricted13%(6 notices)
    6 of 48 notices are Limited / restricted (13%).
  • Open6%(3 notices)
    3 of 48 notices are Open (6%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2.5indicative · n=20% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

96 daysmoderate · n=3
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 48 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

06 of 48 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0.1% above estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Efficio Ltd318.8%339 Feb 2026
DLA Piperframework/DPS on 1212.5%2311 Aug 2026
Gowling WLG (UK) LLPframework/DPS on 1212.5%2223 Apr 2026
TLT LLPframework/DPS on 1212.5%2221 Jul 2026
Dentons UK & Middle East LLPframework/DPS on 116.3%1215 Jan 2026
Salesforce UK Limited16.3%1228 May 2026
Addleshaw Goddard LLPframework/DPS on 116.3%1215 Jan 2026
Jones Lang LaSalle Ltd16.3%1124 Apr 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 38% of 16 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 16 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£56mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 12 of 12 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 78%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£2.4m middle valuerobust · n=12Middle half £1.8m–£4.9m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
NESO Interim CapabilityPalantir Technologies UK Ltd25 Aug 202611 mo · up to 1.9 yrs£17,700,270
Microsoft Enterprise and On-Premise Infrastructure Licensing AgreementInsight Direct——£11,836,235 †
Procurement Services - Operations, Indirects & Digital Data Technology (DD&T)Efficio Ltd9 Feb 20262 yrs · up to 4 yrs£7,700,000
≈ £3.9m/yr
Salesforce Platform Licensing and Support ServicesSalesforce UK Limited—1 yrs£4,008,005
≈ £4.0m/yr
Operator ConsoleProAv Limited——£2,540,037 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

11 of 41 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 53 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Contingent Labour and options for Permanent Recruitment providerSupply services of personnel including temporary staffPlanned15 Oct 2026£60,000,000
HPE CNI Support & Professional ServicesAwarded / complete12 Oct 2026—
NESO Interim CapabilityAwarded / complete6 Oct 2026—
DSI Phase 2Awarded / complete6 Oct 2026—
NESO Coach Services TenderRoad transport servicesAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026£2,050,000
ECP & OPDE Maintenance SupportAwarded / complete26 Aug 2026—
Strategic Enterprise Modelling Capability SolutionData servicesPlanning25 Aug 2026—
Lead Legal Services Provider for Project EchoAwarded / complete31 Jul 2026—
Technical Consultancy FrameworkFramework5 lotsTechnical analysis or consultancy servicesOpen30 Jul 2026£60,500,000
Salesforce Platform Licensing and Support ServicesAwarded / complete26 Jun 2026—
NESO Surveyor Agency RFPAwarded / complete18 Jun 2026—
Microsoft Enterprise and On-Premise Infrastructure Licensing AgreementSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete8 Jun 2026—
Procurement ServicesProcurement consultancy servicesAwarded / complete27 May 2026£7,000,000
NESO Engineering Support ServicesFrameworkEngineering servicesPlanned26 May 2026—
NESO Facilities Management Services FrameworkFrameworkBuilding and facilities management servicesPlanned22 May 2026—
NESO Workplace Fit-Out, Refurbishment and Associated Works (East England)Building completion workPlanned22 May 2026—
NESO Workplace Fit-Out, Refurbishment and Associated Works (North England)Building completion workPlanned22 May 2026—
NESO Workplace Fit-Out, Refurbishment and Associated Works (Wales)Building completion workPlanned22 May 2026—
NESO Workplace Fit-Out, Refurbishment and Associated Works (Midlands)Building completion workPlanned22 May 2026—
DD&T Value Added Reseller (VAR)NetworksPlanned22 May 2026—

Search all 53 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 11 of 41 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.