North Lincolnshire Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityYorkshire and the HumberScunthorpeRan 3 procurements for other authorities

Official UK PPONPDZY-9248-XLCG

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months134+227% vs prior 12 months (41)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot163.2% single-bid · 87 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 87 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share29%of 200 awarded procedures · 163 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

200 awarded tenders, 163 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months298 within 6 months · 2 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£22mnet · on 95 of 95 published values · top 5 = 48%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 175 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract91%(160 notices)
    160 of 175 notices are Contract (91%).
  • Framework9%(15 notices)
    15 of 175 notices are Framework (9%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Selective38%(67 notices)
    67 of 175 notices are Selective (38%).
  • Open26%(46 notices)
    46 of 175 notices are Open (26%).
  • Direct award13%(23 notices)
    23 of 175 notices are Direct award (13%).
  • Limited / restricted13%(22 notices)
    22 of 175 notices are Limited / restricted (13%).
  • Route not published10%(17 notices)
    17 of 175 notices are Route not published (10%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 87 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

1robust · n=8763.2% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 26 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

50 daysrobust · n=26
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 175 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

037 of 175 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 13 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

6.1% below estimaterobust · n=13

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
JP Developers Ltd3819%3838—
EC Surfacing LTD115.5%211—
EC Surfacing Ltd94.5%99—
Phoenix Software Ltd73.5%67—
PBS Construction (North East) Limited52.5%35—
Tarmac Trading Limited42%24—
Acumen Solutions Ltd31.5%33—
Tucker & Tunstalls Limited31.5%3331 Mar 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 29% of 200 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 163 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£22mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 95 of 95 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 48%; a further 52 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£40k middle valuerobust · n=95Middle half £9k–£182k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Warm Homes SchemeYes Energy Solutions——£3,100,000 †
Corporate Energy SupplyCORONA ENERGY LIMITED——£2,600,000 †
Corporate Water SupplyWave Ltd——£2,461,068 †
Carers Support Service, with Dementia Advisory SupportCarers Support Centre——£1,494,763 †
Domestic Abuse Support ServicesThe Blue Door support Service CIC——£1,041,200 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

60 of 223 contracts carry an end date, 17 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 29 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 270 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
250237 - DFG - Lot 8Building construction workAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
250181 - DFG - Lot 8Building construction workAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
250390 - DFG - Lot 8Building construction workAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
250174 - DFG - Lot 8Building construction workAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
250459 - DFG - Lot 8Building construction workAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
250356 - DFG - Lot 8Building construction workAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
L11-286 Hibaldstow Carriageway ResurfacingConstruction workAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
L09-101 Highfield Avenue & Cliff Gardens Infrastructure Improvement WorksConstruction workAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
L09-101 Highfield Avenue & Cliff Gardens Infrastructure Improvement WorksConstruction workAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
L11-298 Scunthorpe Recycling CentreConstruction workAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
L11-296 Footway Resurfacing ProgrammeVarious surface worksAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
L11-287 Bottesford ResurfacingSurface work for roadsAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
L11-300 Sandtoft Road (Epworth Road), ResurfacingVarious surface worksAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
L11-299 First time find and fix gangsRoad-maintenance worksAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
Electronic Case Bundling SolutionDatabase-management systemAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
Booknow SoftwareSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
Provision of temporary agency staff to fill the vacant role of Principal Planning OfficerAwarded / complete14 Aug 2026—
Salesforce AnalyticsSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete14 Aug 2026—
Salesforce Engagement - Marketing and PublishingSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete14 Aug 2026—
Salesforce Core LicensingSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete14 Aug 2026—

Search all 270 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 60 of 223 published contracts have an end date; 17 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.