NOTTING HILL GENESIS: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Companies House: Registered Society·Social housing register: Registered society·Greater London·London
Official UK PPONPLMP-3644-HBBNWebsitenhg.org.uk ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
138 awarded tenders, 335 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
45 Construction work13 procedures · 11%50 Repair and maintenance services10 procedures · 8%71 Architectural, construction, engineering8 procedures · 7%44 Construction structures and materials6 procedures · 5%31 Electrical machinery4 procedures · 3%79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting4 procedures · 3%90 Sewage, refuse, cleaning and environmental4 procedures · 3%35 Security, fire-fighting, police3 procedures · 2%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 123 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract87%(107 notices)
107 of 123 notices are Contract (87%).Framework11%(14 notices)
14 of 123 notices are Framework (11%).Dynamic purchasing system2%(2 notices)
2 of 123 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (2%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Direct award50%(61 notices)
61 of 123 notices are Direct award (50%).Limited / restricted32%(39 notices)
39 of 123 notices are Limited / restricted (32%).Route not published7%(9 notices)
9 of 123 notices are Route not published (7%).Open6%(7 notices)
7 of 123 notices are Open (6%).Selective6%(7 notices)
7 of 123 notices are Selective (6%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.
Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 123 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axis Europe | 5 | 3.6% | 3 | 6 | — |
| Phoenix Software Ltd | 4 | 2.9% | 4 | 4 | — |
| CORE MEDIA SERVICES (UK) LTD | 4 | 2.9% | 1 | 4 | — |
| BDO LLP | 3 | 2.2% | 3 | 3 | — |
| D&L Contract Services Ltd | 3 | 2.2% | 3 | 3 | — |
| Astrum HR Search and Selection Limited | 3 | 2.2% | 3 | 3 | — |
| ABCA systems limited | 3 | 2.2% | 1 | 4 | — |
| Jones Lang LaSalle Ltd | 3 | 2.2% | 1 | 3 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 9% of 138 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 335 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water Hygiene Remedial Works and Legionella Consultancy | Urban Environments Limited | — | — | £4,700,000 † |
| Essex South Cleaning | PCMS Cleaning Services Limited | 25 Feb 2026 | 2.8 yrs · up to 6.8 yrs | £2,147,388 ≈ £781k/yr |
| High Risk Buildings (incl. design) | Apex Lift & Escalator Engineers Limited | — | — | £2,085,270 † |
| Essex (South) Grounds (Gardening) Maintenance | JCS GARDEN CLEANING LIMITED | 25 Feb 2026 | 2.8 yrs · up to 6.8 yrs | £2,044,976 ≈ £744k/yr |
| Essex North Cleaning | Cleanscapes Ltd | 25 Feb 2026 | 2.8 yrs · up to 6.8 yrs | £1,556,921 ≈ £566k/yr |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
141 of 202 contracts carry an end date, 42 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Holder | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demolition | S.D. Installations Ltd | 31 Oct 2026 | £26,978 |
| Fire Remediation | Sedgwick Repair Solutions UK Ltd | 11 Nov 2026 | £65,000 |
| Consultancy | Data Protection People Ltd | 13 Nov 2026 | £42,000 |
| Recruitment | Odgers Group Limited | 20 Nov 2026 | £52,000 |
| Recruitment | Astrum HR Search and Selection Limited | 30 Nov 2026 | £27,000 |
| Recruitment | Astrum HR Search and Selection Limited | 30 Nov 2026 | £27,000 |
| Consultancy | Altair Consultancy & Advisory Services Ltd | 30 Nov 2026 | £56,000 |
| Security | S&K Enforcement Solutions Limited | 10 Dec 2026 | £50,000 |
| Technology and Digital Consultancy Services | REPLY LIMITED | 31 Dec 2026 | £1,159,500 |
| Recruitment | Astrum HR Search and Selection Limited | 31 Dec 2026 | £50,000 |
Soonest 10 of 35 contracts ending within 18 months.
Recent procedures
Latest 50 of 163 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audit services | Awarded / complete | 20 May 2026 | — |
| IT equipment | Awarded / complete | 30 Apr 2026 | — |
| Risk Management | Awarded / complete | 30 Apr 2026 | — |
| Heat network | Awarded / complete | 28 Apr 2026 | — |
| Recruitment | Awarded / complete | 28 Apr 2026 | — |
| Cyber Security consultancy | Awarded / complete | 30 Mar 2026 | — |
| Software | Awarded / complete | 30 Mar 2026 | — |
| IT Consultancy | Awarded / complete | 30 Mar 2026 | — |
| Corporate consultancy | Awarded / complete | 30 Mar 2026 | — |
| Corporate consultancy | Awarded / complete | 30 Mar 2026 | — |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 141 of 202 published contracts have an end date; 42 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.