Oxford Brookes University: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

DfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationSouth East EnglandOxford

Official UK PPONPPGL-1164-DJLT

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months55+162% vs prior 12 months (21)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot325% single-bid · 4 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share21%of 77 awarded procedures · 63 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

77 awarded tenders, 63 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months4none within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£11mnet · on 41 of 41 published values · top 5 = 64%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 76 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(76 notices)
    76 of 76 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award53%(40 notices)
    40 of 76 notices are Direct award (53%).
  • Limited / restricted14%(11 notices)
    11 of 76 notices are Limited / restricted (14%).
  • Open13%(10 notices)
    10 of 76 notices are Open (13%).
  • Selective13%(10 notices)
    10 of 76 notices are Selective (13%).
  • Route not published7%(5 notices)
    5 of 76 notices are Route not published (7%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3moderate · n=425% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

27 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 76 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

09 of 76 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimatemoderate · n=3

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Jisc911.7%9919 Feb 2026
Jisc Services Ltd45.2%44—
Kale Interiors Ltd33.9%331 May 2026
Brook Young People T/a Brook22.6%22—
CLARIVATE ANALYTICS22.6%2215 Sept 2026
Limbs & Things Limited22.6%12—
Bidwells11.3%12—
Robertson Bell Ltd11.3%12—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 21% of 77 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 63 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£11mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 41 of 41 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 64%; a further 15 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£65k middle valuerobust · n=41Middle half £38k–£179k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Student Records System (SRS) platform and associated support servicesELLUCIAN GLOBAL LIMITED1 Feb 20263 yrs£2,492,610
≈ £831k/yr
Oxford Brookes University Corporate Travel ProviderCorporate Travel Management (North) Limited——£2,000,000 †
HR System Renewal - People XDAccess UK Ltd——£960,481 †
In-Country RecruitmentGrok Global Services Inc26 Jun 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£825,000
≈ £275k/yr
Deep CleaningCrystal Facilities Management——£521,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

50 of 73 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 88 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
American Psychology Association (APA) resources - APA PsycInfo and APA PsycArticles (via Jisc-Chest)Awarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
EBSCO Database Subscriptions (2026-2029)Awarded / complete20 Oct 2026—
OUP Online Products for HE 2026-2030Awarded / complete19 Oct 2026—
JSTOR Archive Collections Full Access 2026-2029Awarded / complete19 Oct 2026—
O'Reilly for Higher EducationAwarded / complete12 Oct 2026—
Neonatal Medical Training ManikinsAwarded / complete9 Oct 2026—
Sport & Active Wellness KitSports goods and equipmentAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026£180,000
ProQuest DatabasesAwarded / complete7 Oct 2026—
Online Programme Management (OPM)Education and training servicesPlanning2 Oct 2026£5,000,000
E6 Compliant Bystander TrainingAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
E6 Compliance Consent TrainingAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
SAE Mobilus Academic PackageAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
Debt Collection Services: Student & CommercialLegal servicesAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026—
MarketLine AdvantageAwarded / complete21 Sept 2026—
Wolters Kluwer - 10 individual journal titles (online)Awarded / complete10 Sept 2026—
Adobe Creative Cloud ETLA 2026Software package and information systemsAwarded / complete9 Sept 2026—
Purchase of rowing launchesAwarded / complete9 Sept 2026—
Infrastructure Monitoring ToolAwarded / complete28 Aug 2026—
Online Staff Learning Content HubAwarded / complete21 Aug 2026—
Threat and Vulnerability Review for Oxford Brookes UniversityAwarded / complete17 Aug 2026—

Search all 88 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 50 of 73 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.