Regenda Limited: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Registered SocietySocial housing register: Registered societyNorth West EnglandLiverpool

Official UK PPONPPQX-3165-WXYN

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months25+525% vs prior 12 months (4)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot60% single-bid · 3 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share21%of 33 awarded procedures · 140 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

33 awarded tenders, 140 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months197 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£4.3mnet · on 13 of 13 published values · top 5 = 77%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 29 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract97%(28 notices)
    28 of 29 notices are Contract (97%).
  • Framework3%(1 notice)
    1 of 29 notices is Framework (3%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted62%(18 notices)
    18 of 29 notices are Limited / restricted (62%).
  • Direct award17%(5 notices)
    5 of 29 notices are Direct award (17%).
  • Open10%(3 notices)
    3 of 29 notices are Open (10%).
  • Route not published10%(3 notices)
    3 of 29 notices are Route not published (10%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

6moderate · n=30% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

67 daysmoderate · n=3
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 29 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

03 of 29 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

8.6% above estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
C and C Projects North Ltd412.1%44—
Ecogee Limited26.1%22—
Recom Solutions Ltdframework/DPS on 113%1523 Feb 2026
C4 PROJECTS LIMITEDframework/DPS on 113%1424 Feb 2026
Avrenim Group LTDframework/DPS on 113%1423 Feb 2026
Greenmount Projects Ltdframework/DPS on 113%1323 Feb 2026
Rider Levett Bucknall Ltdframework/DPS on 113%1324 Feb 2026
Manchester & Cheshire Construction Co. Limitedframework/DPS on 113%1323 Feb 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 21% of 33 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 140 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£4.3mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 13 of 13 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 77%; a further 13 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£162k middle valuerobust · n=13Middle half £136k–£367k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Groundworks for New Ferry Site A CheshireThomas Contracting Ltd—1.3 yrs · up to 2.3 yrs£1,771,899 †
≈ £1.4m/yr
Timber Frame Installation Works - M&Y New Ferry Site ASticx Limited—1.1 yrs · up to 2.1 yrs£524,814 †
≈ £484k/yr
M&Y Electrical Works Subcontractor Appointment - New Ferry Site A - CheshireCP Hood Electrical Ltd—1 yrs · up to 2 yrs£405,000 †
≈ £405k/yr
Brickwork subcontractor appointment for New Ferry Site AMBG Brickwork Ltd—1 yrs · up to 2 yrs£366,836 †
≈ £367k/yr
Light Gauge Steel Frame Installation Works - New Ferry Site AIMS Facades Limited—1 yrs · up to 2 yrs£263,390 †
≈ £263k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

43 of 47 contracts carry an end date, 4 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 19 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 35 of 35 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Repositioning of Light Wells Green Street MacclesfieldAwarded / complete30 Mar 2026—
Provision of Site Security ServicesSecurity servicesAwarded / complete16 Mar 2026£655,900
Appointment of a Clerk of WorksAwarded / complete10 Mar 2026—
Provision of Customer Census ServicesAwarded / complete21 Jan 2026—
Retrofit Coordination ServicesAwarded / complete4 Dec 2025—
LCR Retrofit WorksAwarded / complete12 Sept 2025—
Retrofit Works GMCAAwarded / complete11 Sept 2025—
Provision of licences for eProcurement SystemAwarded / complete6 Aug 2025—
Housing Data Enterprise Data Management Software (HseDE)Awarded / complete2 Apr 2025—
The Regenda Group - Legal Services FrameworkFrameworkcentral purchasing body4 lotsLegal advisory and representation servicesAwarded / complete16 Sept 2024£10,000,000
Regenda Homes Mechanical and Electronic Securitycentral purchasing body4 lotsMiscellaneous repair and maintenance servicesOpen12 Apr 2024—
Asbestos Abatement and Removal Servicescentral purchasing bodyAsbestos removal servicesOpen16 Feb 2024—
Supply of Office Stationery, Furniture and Offices SundriesOffice suppliesAwarded / complete23 May 2023—
Employee Assistance and Occupational Health provision2 lotsArchitecturalAwarded / complete4 May 2021—
PS0005 - Payroll Management ServicesPayroll management servicesAwarded / complete25 Mar 2021—

Search all 35 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 43 of 47 published contracts have an end date; 4 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.