Reserve Forces' and Cadets' Associations - Yorkshire and the Humber: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Other public body·Yorkshire and the Humber·York
Official UK PPONPHLW-9274-WYGR
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
11 awarded tenders, 11 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
45 Construction work15 procedures · 58%44 Construction structures and materials7 procedures · 27%42 Industrial machinery3 procedures · 12%72 IT services: consulting, software, internet2 procedures · 8%34 Transport equipment and products1 procedure · 4%48 Software package and information systems1 procedure · 4%71 Architectural, construction, engineering1 procedure · 4%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 26 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract100%(26 notices)
26 of 26 notices are Contract (100%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open65%(17 notices)
17 of 26 notices are Open (65%).Direct award19%(5 notices)
5 of 26 notices are Direct award (19%).Route not published8%(2 notices)
2 of 26 notices are Route not published (8%).Limited / restricted4%(1 notice)
1 of 26 notices is Limited / restricted (4%).Selective4%(1 notice)
1 of 26 notices is Selective (4%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.
Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 26 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VEOLIA ES (UK) LIMITED | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 1 | 12 Jun 2026 |
| RACEWAY BUILDERS LIMITED | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 1 | 30 Oct 2026 |
| AWS Landscaping Ltd | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 1 | 23 Jul 2025 |
| RW Gardening Ltd | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 1 | 7 Aug 2025 |
| Moore Kingston Smith LLP | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 1 | 17 Aug 2026 |
| Specialised Group Ltd | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 1 | 10 Jul 2026 |
| Alan Wood Partnership Limited | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 1 | 21 Nov 2025 |
| J A Kent | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 1 | 16 Apr 2026 |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 27% of 11 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 11 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scarbrough Barracks Locker Cages | RACEWAY BUILDERS LIMITED | 30 Oct 2026 | 1 mo · up to 0.4 yrs | £49,591 |
| YH-RFCA - Scunthorpe ARC Roofing Works | Specialised Group Ltd | 10 Jul 2026 | 1 mo | £19,790 |
| YH-RFCA - Architectural and PD Services - Demolition of Cadet Huts and Range at Immingham | Alan Wood Partnership Limited | 21 Nov 2025 | 2 mo | £6,850 |
| Howden Fence and Gate | Heras Perimeter Protection Ltd | 30 Oct 2026 | — | £6,000 |
Recent procedures
Latest 26 of 26 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| NW RFCA Grounds Maintenance 2025/26 | Awarded / complete | 1 Oct 2025 | — |
| Roof Replacement Works at Mather Avenue ARC and Langdon House ARCRoof-tiling work | Open | 24 Sept 2025 | £200,000 |
| EA RFCA Grounds Maintenance Services 2025/26 | Awarded / complete | 7 Aug 2025 | — |
| Grounds Maintenance 25/26 | Awarded / complete | 7 Aug 2025 | — |
| Customer Relationship Management system for Defence Relationship Management (DRM)Customer Relation Management software development services | Planning | 24 Jul 2025 | £0 |
| Council of Reserve Forces' and Cadets' Associations - DRM Employers Attitude Monitoring SurveyData collection and collation services | Open | 13 Jun 2025 | £192,000 |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.