SALIX FINANCE LTD: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)GOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public bodyCentral governmentGreater LondonLondon

Companies House05068355 ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months13+117% vs prior 12 months (6)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share47%of 17 awarded procedures · 15 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

17 awarded tenders, 15 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months84 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£3.5mnet · on 16 of 19 published values · 3 repeated amounts set aside · top 5 = 77%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 19 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(19 notices)
    19 of 19 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted37%(7 notices)
    7 of 19 notices are Limited / restricted (37%).
  • Open26%(5 notices)
    5 of 19 notices are Open (26%).
  • Route not published21%(4 notices)
    4 of 19 notices are Route not published (21%).
  • Direct award11%(2 notices)
    2 of 19 notices are Direct award (11%).
  • Selective5%(1 notices)
    1 of 19 notices are Selective (5%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

6indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 19 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

04 of 19 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Phoenix Software Ltd423.5%448 Jun 2026
Ricardo AEA Ltd211.8%2216 Apr 2026
DWF LLP211.8%22—
Faithful+Gould15.9%1116 Apr 2026
ARCADIS CONSULTING (UK) LIMITED15.9%1116 Apr 2026
Constellia Public Ltd15.9%118 Jul 2026
THE RETROFIT ACADEMY COMMUNITY INTEREST COMPANY15.9%11—
LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL15.9%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 47% of 17 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 15 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£3.5mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 16 of 19 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 77%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£88k middle valuerobust · n=16Middle half £58k–£177k; 3 awards with ambiguous equal values within a procedure excluded from both figures.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
P77 - Technical AssessorsConstellia Public Ltd8 Jul 20262.7 yrs£1,300,000
≈ £488k/yr
Legal Panel ServicesDWF LLP——£600,000 †
MS LicensesPhoenix Software Ltd——£400,000 †
Managed Service Provider and Transformation SupportPhoenix Software Ltd—1.5 yrs£191,382
≈ £128k/yr
Supply of Dell LaptopsPhoenix Software Ltd—1 yrs£171,801 †
≈ £172k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

12 of 19 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 19 of 19 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
P74 - Office WiFiInformation technology servicesAwarded / complete17 Sept 2026—
P77 - Technical AssessorsAwarded / complete22 Jul 2026—
P45 - Audit of Decarbonisation WorksAuditing servicesAwarded / complete17 Jul 2026£700,000
Managed Service Provider and Transformation SupportAwarded / complete8 Jun 2026—
Mobile Phones HardwareMobile telephonesAwarded / complete3 Jun 2026—
Hard Skills Training ProviderAwarded / complete3 Jun 2026—
CRM Consultant RecruitmentAwarded / complete3 Jun 2026—
Legal Panel ServicesLegal advisory servicesAwarded / complete28 May 2026—
Soft Skills Training Provider2 lotsTraining servicesAwarded / complete18 May 2026£292,000
Microsoft Software LicencesSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete5 Mar 2026—
Retrofit TrainingAwarded / complete26 Feb 2026—
Supply of Dell LaptopsAwarded / complete10 Feb 2026—
Technical Assessment ServicesBuilding services consultancy servicesAwarded / complete21 Jan 2026£176,000
Short-Term Legal ServicesLegal servicesAwarded / complete11 Dec 2025—
Prince2 Agile TrainingTraining servicesAwarded / complete5 Nov 2025£84,000
Server Support ContractSystem and support servicesAwarded / complete22 Sept 2025—
Master Vendor Interim Recruitment ContractRecruitment servicesAwarded / complete18 Sept 2025—
Building Decarbonisation Advisory Services2 lotsArchitecturalOpen20 Feb 2025£8,000,000
Building Decarbonisation Consultancy Services2 lotsArchitecturalPlanned8 Jan 2025£5,000,000

Search all 19 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 12 of 19 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.