University of Portsmouth Higher Education Corporation: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

DfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationSouth East EnglandPortsmouth

Official UK PPONPWYV-2655-NPMQWebsiteport.ac.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months93+389% vs prior 12 months (19)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot250% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share19%of 106 awarded procedures · 85 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

106 awarded tenders, 85 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months144 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£43mnet · on 75 of 75 published values · top 5 = 54%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 112 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(112 notices)
    112 of 112 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted40%(45 notices)
    45 of 112 notices are Limited / restricted (40%).
  • Direct award31%(35 notices)
    35 of 112 notices are Direct award (31%).
  • Route not published18%(20 notices)
    20 of 112 notices are Route not published (18%).
  • Open6%(7 notices)
    7 of 112 notices are Open (6%).
  • Selective4%(5 notices)
    5 of 112 notices are Selective (4%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2robust · n=650% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 7 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

25 daysrobust · n=7
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 112 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

010 of 112 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimatemoderate · n=3

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
RIDGE AND PARTNERS LLP98.5%91014 Oct 2025
Academia Ltd98.5%99—
NAVITAS UK HOLDINGS LIMITED21.9%2211 Mar 2026
Wrights Health Group21.9%22—
LSI Architects (Design) Limited21.9%22—
VERTEC SCIENTIFIC LTD21.9%22—
MTI Technology ltd21.9%22—
VIRTUS 7 LTD21.9%22—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 19% of 106 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 85 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£43mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 75 of 75 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 54%; a further 22 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£121k middle valuerobust · n=75Middle half £58k–£420k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Enterprise Resource Platform (ERP) System software solutionOracle Corporation UK Limited——£6,962,567 †
Enterprise Resource Platform (ERP) System Implementation (SI) partnerMastek (UK) Ltd9 Jun 20264 yrs · up to 6 yrs£4,306,048
≈ £1.1m/yr
Wiltshire Building Works TenderQuinn (London) Limited11 Jul 20258 mo · up to 0.9 yrs£4,300,352
Security ServicesMitie Security Ltd——£3,715,655 †
University of Portsmouth Bus ServicesFIRST HAMPSHIRE & DORSET LIMITED23 May 20253 yrs · up to 5 yrs£3,646,412
≈ £1.2m/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

56 of 100 contracts carry an end date, 3 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 14 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 127 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Enterprise Resource Platform (ERP) System software solutionIT services: consultingAwarded / complete5 Aug 2026—
Tax Advice ServicesTax consultancy servicesAwarded / complete3 Aug 2026—
Provision of Non -Medical helpAdult-education services at university levelAwarded / complete27 Jul 2026£624,000
American Psychological Databases 26-29 Subscription UoPAwarded / complete24 Jul 2026—
Global Agent Management Platform Market EngagementComputer support and consultancy servicesPlanning20 Jul 2026£228,000
Dental Haptics EquipmentDental and subspecialty instruments and devicesAwarded / complete15 Jul 2026£230,000
Papercut MF Print ManagementAwarded / complete7 Jul 2026—
BSOL Knowledge Subscription 2026-2029Awarded / complete3 Jul 2026—
Student Enrolment Management ServiceAwarded / complete3 Jul 2026—
Lexis Nexis SubscriptionAwarded / complete25 Jun 2026—
Linked -in LearningSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete16 Jun 2026—
Overseas Hosting Services - NigeriaAwarded / complete16 Jun 2026—
EBSCO Database Subscription (2026-2029)Awarded / complete15 Jun 2026—
Barbour Estates Management, Wellbeing & International Modules subscriptionAwarded / complete10 Jun 2026—
Enterprise Resource Platform (ERP) System Implementation (SI) partnerAwarded / complete9 Jun 2026—
Building Occupancy Sensors- Pre Market EngagementBuilding servicesPlanning9 Jun 2026£625,000
Lab GasesGasesAwarded / complete2 Jun 2026—
Electronics ComponentsElectronic componentsAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026—
Learning System in support of ApprenticeshipsSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete29 May 2026—
CRM & Marketing Cloud RenewalSales or marketing software packageAwarded / complete29 May 2026—

Search all 127 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 56 of 100 published contracts have an end date; 3 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.