UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD(THE): Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Royal Charter CompanyDfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationNorth West EnglandSALFORD

Companies HouseRC000666 ↗

Open now3next deadline 29 Oct 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months69+10% vs prior 12 months (63)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot412.5% single-bid · 48 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 48 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share9%of 140 awarded procedures · 137 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

140 awarded tenders, 137 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months81 within 6 months · 2 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£7.9mnet · on 39 of 39 published values · top 5 = 59%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

3 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 132 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract92%(121 notices)
    121 of 132 notices are Contract (92%).
  • Framework8%(11 notices)
    11 of 132 notices are Framework (8%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open46%(61 notices)
    61 of 132 notices are Open (46%).
  • Direct award29%(38 notices)
    38 of 132 notices are Direct award (29%).
  • Limited / restricted16%(21 notices)
    21 of 132 notices are Limited / restricted (16%).
  • Route not published8%(10 notices)
    10 of 132 notices are Route not published (8%).
  • Selective2%(2 notices)
    2 of 132 notices are Selective (2%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 48 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4robust · n=4812.5% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 47 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

11 daysrobust · n=47
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 132 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

056 of 132 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 42 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

1.9% below estimaterobust · n=42

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Softcat Plcframework/DPS on 253.6%5524 Jul 2026
BRUKER UK LIMITED42.9%449 Jul 2026
Phoenix Software Ltdframework/DPS on 232.1%3312 Aug 2026
AMP EV Limited21.4%237 Jul 2026
Dixon Walter21.4%221 May 2025
Schofield & Sonsframework/DPS on 121.4%2223 Jun 2026
A.T. NOLAN (BUILDING CONTRACTORS) LIMITED21.4%227 Aug 2025
Dynamic FM Ltd21.4%2229 Jan 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 9% of 140 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 137 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£7.9mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 39 of 39 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 59%; a further 68 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£65k middle valuerobust · n=39Middle half £39k–£203k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Oracle HCM Co-Managed ServiceNamos Solutions Limited19 Feb 20263 yrs · up to 5.1 yrs£1,199,408
≈ £400k/yr
Unit4 Enterprise Resource Planning renewalUNIT4 Business Software Limited11 Sept 20265 yrs£1,163,000
≈ £233k/yr
Public Realm Programme Phase OnePlanit I.E. Limited18 Aug 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£1,135,893
≈ £379k/yr
Software-as-a-Service-based solution for research and knowledge exchange administrationWorktribe11 Sept 20265 yrs£736,999
≈ £147k/yr
Movement Analysis EquipmentQualisys AB24 Sept 20261 yrs£423,464
≈ £423k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

52 of 54 contracts carry an end date, 37 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 155 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Sports Rehabilitation Equipment (Thrive Building)Sports goods and equipmentAwarded / complete9 Oct 2026£75,000
Online assessment for measuring students' understanding of sustainabilityAwarded / complete6 Oct 2026—
Unit4 Enterprise Resource Planning renewalAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
Student Capability Measuring and Reporting ProductSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026£60,000
Allerton Building AHU ReplacementAwarded / complete29 Sept 2026—
Clifford Whitworth extract fan replacementAwarded / complete29 Sept 2026—
Faith Centre Solar PV and Fall Arrest System InstallationBuilding installation workOpen25 Sept 2026£90,000
Movement Analysis EquipmentAnalysis apparatusAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026£450,000
Sanitary Waste ProvisionFrameworkAwarded / complete21 Sept 2026—
Software-as-a-Service-based solution for research and knowledge exchange administrationAwarded / complete11 Sept 2026—
Disability Support Service8 lotsHealth and social work servicesCancelled8 Sept 2026£2,730,996
Refurbishment of Maxwell 819Refurbishment workOpen28 Aug 2026£75,000
Pest Control ServicesPest-control servicesOpen24 Aug 2026£90,000
Public Realm Programme Phase OneOverhaul and refurbishment workAwarded / complete18 Aug 2026£711,107
EMG SystemAwarded / complete13 Aug 2026—
Red Hat LicencesFrameworkAwarded / complete13 Aug 2026—
STUDIOSITY LEARNING SUPPORT PROGRAMAwarded / complete11 Aug 2026—
South Asia ICRsMarketing servicesAwarded / complete5 Aug 2026£115,000
Electric Vehicle Charge Points and Ancillary ServicesAwarded / complete5 Aug 2026—
Dynamic and Interactive SimulationAwarded / complete5 Aug 2026—

Search all 155 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 52 of 54 published contracts have an end date; 37 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.