University of Staffordshire: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

DfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationWest MidlandsStoke on Trent

Registry IDGB-UKPRN-10006299Websitestaffs.ac.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months16+60% vs prior 12 months (10)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share13%of 24 awarded procedures · 28 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

24 awarded tenders, 28 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months31 within 6 months · 1 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£2.8mnet · on 15 of 15 published values · top 5 = 83%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 26 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract96%(25 notices)
    25 of 26 notices are Contract (96%).
  • Framework4%(1 notice)
    1 of 26 notices is Framework (4%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award42%(11 notices)
    11 of 26 notices are Direct award (42%).
  • Limited / restricted23%(6 notices)
    6 of 26 notices are Limited / restricted (23%).
  • Open15%(4 notices)
    4 of 26 notices are Open (15%).
  • Route not published15%(4 notices)
    4 of 26 notices are Route not published (15%).
  • Selective4%(1 notice)
    1 of 26 notices is Selective (4%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 26 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

05 of 26 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
London Metropolitan University14.2%11—
Anything Is Possible Media Limited14.2%11—
Namos Solutions Limited14.2%11—
Chetham House Limited T/A SF Taylorframework/DPS on 114.2%11—
Full Spectrum Print Mediaframework/DPS on 114.2%11—
Veolia14.2%11—
ENROLY LTD14.2%11—
Hickling & Squires UKframework/DPS on 114.2%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 13% of 24 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 28 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£2.8mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 15 of 15 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 83%; a further 4 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£61k middle valuerobust · n=15Middle half £34k–£139k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Occupational Health ServicesTP Health Ltd——£800,000 †
London Campus Planned Preventative Maintenance ContractHR FACILITIES LIMITED TRADING AS SMART MANAGED SOLUTIONS16 Feb 20262 yrs · up to 5 yrs£750,000
≈ £375k/yr
Demolition , Landscaping and Squires View Car Park PCSA StageWillmott Dixon Construction Limited——£500,000 †
Namos eNlighten ServicesNamos Solutions Limited——£149,619 †
Marketing Campaigns and Events PlatformGecko Labs ltd—3 yrs£128,150 †
≈ £43k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

18 of 24 contracts carry an end date, 2 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 31 of 31 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
LCMS Crosslab Silver Maintenance ContractAwarded / complete5 Oct 2026—
Partner to improve visibility across SEO and AI/GEOAwarded / complete9 Jul 2026—
Games on Tour VehicleMotor vehiclesOpen29 Jun 2026£200,000
Integrated Employee Experience PlatformCommunication and multimedia software packagePlanning8 Jun 2026£252,000
Emergency Lighting Testing & Remedial/Installation Works Market EngagementEmergency lighting equipmentPlanning21 May 2026£332,000
Vehicle for Games on TourMotor vehicles for the transport of goodsCancelled8 May 2026£170,000
London Campus Planned Preventative Maintenance ContractBuilding installation workAwarded / complete6 May 2026£750,000
External Audit ServicesAccounting review servicesAwarded / complete24 Apr 2026£750,000
Namos eNlighten ServicesIT services: consultingAwarded / complete20 Apr 2026—
Apprenticeship Administration Software Market EngagmentSoftware package and information systemsPlanning23 Mar 2026—
Supply of Furniture for the New Student Village HubFurnitureAwarded / complete23 Mar 2026—
Demolition , Landscaping and Squires View Car Park PCSA StageBuilding demolition and wrecking work and earthmoving workAwarded / complete12 Mar 2026—
Marketing Campaigns and Events PlatformAwarded / complete17 Feb 2026—
Architectural Technologist Professional ServicesAwarded / complete16 Feb 2026—
Audio Visual Equipment for Autumn Award CeremoniesAwarded / complete11 Nov 2025—
CAS ShieldAwarded / complete7 Nov 2025—
XRY Licence RenewalAwarded / complete29 Sept 2025—
CNC Milling MachineAwarded / complete25 Sept 2025—
Universities UK Subscription RenewalAwarded / complete25 Sept 2025—
MillionPlus Annual Subcription RenewalAwarded / complete25 Sept 2025—

Search all 31 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 18 of 24 published contracts have an end date; 2 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.