Wealden District Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authoritySouth East EnglandHailsham

Official UK PPONPXRN-7814-TGXG

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months22+57% vs prior 12 months (14)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share11%of 46 awarded procedures · 47 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

46 awarded tenders, 47 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months145 within 6 months · 1 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£26mnet · on 30 of 30 published values · top 5 = 93%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 36 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract97%(35 notices)
    35 of 36 notices are Contract (97%).
  • Framework3%(1 notices)
    1 of 36 notices are Framework (3%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award42%(15 notices)
    15 of 36 notices are Direct award (42%).
  • Limited / restricted28%(10 notices)
    10 of 36 notices are Limited / restricted (28%).
  • Open17%(6 notices)
    6 of 36 notices are Open (17%).
  • Selective11%(4 notices)
    4 of 36 notices are Selective (11%).
  • Route not published3%(1 notices)
    1 of 36 notices are Route not published (3%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

1.5indicative · n=250% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 36 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

09 of 36 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

6.9% below estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
G M Monk Limited24.3%12—
Land Use Consultants24.3%12—
APPLAUSE RURAL TOURING12.2%11—
Neilcott Construction Limited12.2%113 Mar 2026
THE PEOPLE MATTER TRUST12.2%11—
COPE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES LIMITED12.2%11—
GRANICUS-FIRMSTEP LIMITED12.2%11—
Rundle & Co Ltd12.2%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 11% of 46 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 47 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£26mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 30 of 30 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 93%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£60k middle valuerobust · n=30Middle half £37k–£146k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
WDC AB Knights Farm West Refuse Vehicle Depot and Road Infrastructure (ESPH732 CDS)SUNNINGHILL CONSTRUCTION CO. LIMITED7 Aug 20261.6 yrs£13,468,872
≈ £8.5m/yr
WDC Polegate and Willingdon Medical Centre - Main Contractor (ESPH692)Neilcott Construction Limited3 Mar 20261.7 yrs£10,118,042
≈ £6.1m/yr
Supply and Installation of one FTIV Hybrid CrematorFacultatieve Technologies Ltd31 Oct 20251 yrs£456,170
≈ £456k/yr
EX2616 WDC Uckfield Leisure Centre - Solar PV systemG M Monk Limited—2 mo£221,078 †
WDC Architectural design services for the Polegate and Willingdon Medical Centre projectSimpson Hilder Associates—4 mo£169,500 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

44 of 48 contracts carry an end date, 8 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 14 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 53 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
WDC Architectural design services for the Polegate and Willingdon Medical Centre projectAwarded / complete17 Sept 2026—
EX2620 Venue AuditAwarded / complete15 Sept 2026—
WDC Occupational Health Services ContractAwarded / complete8 Sept 2026—
WDC JB Local Environment Quality Survey (ESPH778 LM)Environmental servicesAwarded / complete1 Sept 2026£120,000
EX2624 WDC Wealden Craft WeekAwarded / complete24 Aug 2026—
EX2705 BACAS Nova SAAS AgreementAwarded / complete17 Aug 2026—
WDC AB Knights Farm West Refuse Vehicle Depot and Road Infrastructure (ESPH732 CDS)Main road construction worksAwarded / complete7 Aug 2026£15,000,000
WDC AB Vicarage Fields Essential Repairs (ESPH777 LM)Other building completion workOpen28 Jul 2026£860,000
WDC Mycelia Software SubscriptionAwarded / complete24 Jul 2026—
Wealden Leisure Services Procurement - Legal SupportAwarded / complete6 Jul 2026—
Provision of Modern Polling Software and Equipment to Support Council ElectionsAwarded / complete4 Jun 2026—
Supply and Installation of One FTIV Hybrid CrematorAwarded / complete21 May 2026—
External Support for Local Government Reorganisation in East SussexAwarded / complete21 May 2026—
EX2626 WDC Ashdown Forest Transport ModelAwarded / complete20 May 2026—
WDC JB Comprehensive Site Review: ‘No Stone Unturned’ (ESPH742)Awarded / complete7 May 2026—
WDC CS Sign Provision (ESPH750 CDS)Awarded / complete10 Mar 2026—
WDC Polegate and Willingdon Medical Centre - Main Contractor (ESPH692)Architectural design servicesAwarded / complete3 Mar 2026£10,500,000
EX2604 WDC ESOL ProvisionAwarded / complete16 Feb 2026—
EX2610 Ascendant Solutions for Revenues and BenefitsAwarded / complete11 Feb 2026—
ESPH AB WDC Design Guide (ESPH736 TT)Design consultancy servicesAwarded / complete10 Feb 2026£80,000

Search all 53 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 44 of 48 published contracts have an end date; 8 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.