West Oxfordshire District Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authoritySouth East EnglandWitney

Official UK PPONPZVW-3997-TQJG

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months40+400% vs prior 12 months (8)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot633.3% single-bid · 9 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 9 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share17%of 42 awarded procedures · 39 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

42 awarded tenders, 39 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months43 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£130mnet · on 42 of 42 published values · top 5 = 98%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 48 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(48 notices)
    48 of 48 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted35%(17 notices)
    17 of 48 notices are Limited / restricted (35%).
  • Open31%(15 notices)
    15 of 48 notices are Open (31%).
  • Route not published19%(9 notices)
    9 of 48 notices are Route not published (19%).
  • Direct award15%(7 notices)
    7 of 48 notices are Direct award (15%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 9 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

6robust · n=933.3% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 8 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

25 daysrobust · n=8
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 48 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

010 of 48 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 7 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

10% below estimaterobust · n=7

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
IPL PLASTICS (UK) LIMITED37.1%33—
Trustmarque Solutions Ltd24.8%22—
GSM Ltd24.8%22—
EZ Charge Limited12.4%15—
AECOM LIMITED12.4%11—
Softcat Plc12.4%11—
Connected Kerb Limited12.4%11—
Phoenix Software Ltd12.4%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 17% of 42 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 39 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£130mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 42 of 42 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 98%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£51k middle valuerobust · n=42Middle half £34k–£115k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
OXLEVI – EV Charging InfrastructureConnected Kerb Limited——£95,000,000 †
Oxfordshire Local EV InfrastructureEZ Charge Limited——£16,603,269 †
OXLEVI – EV Charging InfrastructureEZ Charge Limited——£14,226,967 †
Replacement Roof Covering and Various Repair Works at Units 1-3 Carterton Industrial Estate and Station Lane Depot, WitneyCentral Roofing Group Limited——£1,338,996 †
Installation of PV system at Carterton Leisure CentreGSM Ltd—3 mo£320,823 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

28 of 42 contracts carry an end date, 6 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 49 of 49 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Provision of a Digital Interactive Map for Witney, West OxfordshireDigital mapping servicesAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026£30,000
Marriott’s Walk Public RealmLandscaping workAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026£158,000
Wayfinding Scheme in the Witney AreaInstallation of road signsAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026£65,000
Purchase and Installation of Witney Radio Link base station, aerial and purchase of radios.Awarded / complete18 Sept 2026—
External Works Package at a Residential Dwelling, North Leigh, WitneyAwarded / complete16 Sept 2026—
INTERNAL REFURBISHMENT WORKS AT RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGSAwarded / complete16 Sept 2026—
REPAIRS AND DECORATIONS TO WOODGREEN WINDOWSRepair and maintenance servicesOpen7 Aug 2026£36,000
TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATION WORKS TO 19 HOLLOWAY ROADBuilding alteration workOpen3 Aug 2026£40,000
Request for Quotation for the Provision of a Digital Interactive Map for WitneyDigital mapping servicesCancelled27 Jul 2026£15,000
Request for Quotation for INTERNAL REFURBISHMENT WORKS AT RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGSBuilding internal fittingsOpen14 Jul 2026£40,000
REPAIR WORKS 26A WEST END WITNEYBuilding alteration workOpen13 Jul 2026£30,000
External Works Package at a Residential Dwelling, North Leigh, WitneyLandscaping workOpen10 Jul 2026£35,000
The provision of a Footfall and Consumer Insights PlatformEconomic research servicesAwarded / complete19 Jun 2026£63,000
West Oxfordshire Crowdfunding ProgrammeOther communityAwarded / complete10 Jun 2026—
Supply of waste and recycling bins and boxesBinsAwarded / complete9 Jun 2026—
Community Engagement PlatformAwarded / complete2 Jun 2026—
West Oxfordshire Open Space, Sport and Recreation StudyEnvironmental impact assessment other than for constructionAwarded / complete2 Jun 2026£40,000
QU1074738License management software development servicesAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026—
Supply of wheeled binsWaste and rubbish containers and binsAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026—
QU1074737Data servicesAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026—

Search all 49 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 28 of 42 published contracts have an end date; 6 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.