Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentNorth West EnglandBebington

Official UK PPONPBMG-2481-MDJPWebsitewuth.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months12-48% vs prior 12 months (23)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot30% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share16%of 32 awarded procedures · 43 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

32 awarded tenders, 43 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months11 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£14mnet · on 25 of 25 published values · top 5 = 84%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 35 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract94%(33 notices)
    33 of 35 notices are Contract (94%).
  • Framework6%(2 notices)
    2 of 35 notices are Framework (6%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted37%(13 notices)
    13 of 35 notices are Limited / restricted (37%).
  • Direct award20%(7 notices)
    7 of 35 notices are Direct award (20%).
  • Open20%(7 notices)
    7 of 35 notices are Open (20%).
  • Route not published14%(5 notices)
    5 of 35 notices are Route not published (14%).
  • Selective9%(3 notices)
    3 of 35 notices are Selective (9%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=60% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

109 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 35 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

04 of 35 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

27.4% above estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
4ways Healthcare Ltd26.3%22—
SIGNALISE CO-OP LIMITEDframework/DPS on 126.3%2222 May 2026
MEDISERVICES HEALTHCARE LTD13.1%12—
AMERCARE LIMITED13.1%122 Dec 2025
Wirral Multicultural Organisationframework/DPS on 113.1%1122 May 2026
Softcat Plc13.1%11—
Water Plus Limited13.1%11—
Securitas Technology Ltd13.1%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 16% of 32 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 43 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£14mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 25 of 25 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 84%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£73k middle valuerobust · n=25Middle half £19k–£398k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Provision of Consultant Led Healthcare ServicesMERSEY HEALTHCARE LLP3 Dec 20251 yrs · up to 2.3 yrs£5,312,690
≈ £5.3m/yr
Aseptic Unit Re-Development at Arrowe Park HospitalBassaire Cleanrooms Ltd10 Jun 20269 mo£2,841,222
Provision of Radiology Reporting Services4ways Healthcare Ltd——£2,168,618 †
eRosterSoftcat Plc—3 yrs£810,666 †
≈ £270k/yr
Water and WastewaterWater Plus Limited——£808,280 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

10 of 28 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

ContractHolderEndsPublished value
Provision of Consultant Led Healthcare ServicesMERSEY HEALTHCARE LLP31 Mar 2027£5,312,690

Recent procedures

Latest 42 of 42 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Taxi ServicesTaxi servicesOpen27 Jul 2026£150,000
Electromyography and Nerve Condution StudiesNephrology or nervous system specialist servicesAwarded / complete7 Jul 2026—
Provision of Radiology Reporting ServicesHealth servicesAwarded / complete7 Jul 2026—
Aseptic Unit Re-Development at Arrowe Park HospitalBuilding installation workAwarded / complete10 Jun 2026£1,800,000
Air Conditioning MaintenanceAwarded / complete10 Jun 2026—
Provision of Retail Catering ServicesCatering servicesAwarded / complete9 Jun 2026—
Cheshire and Mersey - Accessible SolutionsFramework3 lotsTranslation servicesAwarded / complete22 May 2026£4,000,000
eRosterAwarded / complete8 May 2026—
Employee Assistance ProgrammeAwarded / complete8 May 2026—
Provision of Lithotripsy ServiceHealth servicesAwarded / complete26 Mar 2026—
Provision of Consultant Led Healthcare ServicesHealth servicesAwarded / complete19 Jan 2026£4,500,000
Provision of Dermatology InsourcingDermatology servicesAwarded / complete11 Dec 2025—
Positive Pressure Ducted Gassing & Non Gassing Pharmaceutical Isolators3 lotsLaboratoryAwarded / complete2 Dec 2025£1,000,000
Provision of Radiology Reporting ServicesMedical imaging servicesAwarded / complete25 Nov 2025—
Provision of Lithotripsy ServiceHealth servicesOpen3 Nov 2025£100,000
Implementation and Integration Including NHS 111 Integration UECUP SoftwareMedical software packageAwarded / complete29 Sept 2025—
MAINSAVER ANNUAL SUPPORTAwarded / complete18 Aug 2025—
Wrocs LabelsAwarded / complete18 Aug 2025—
Automatic doors maintenanceInstallation of doorsOpen12 Aug 2025£149,027
Electronic Prescribing SolutionMedical software packageAwarded / complete12 Aug 2025—

Search all 42 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 10 of 28 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.