Alcove Limited: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMECompanies House: Private Limited CompanyCOLCHESTERNationwide (UK)Main market: Health services

Official UK PPONPQNR-8862-VNCV

Procedures with an award1130 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities8named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£12mnet · on 2 of 30 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months4awards · 21 in the prior 24 months · last 24 Jul 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months4end date on 21 of 30 awards
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions6most often East Midlands
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.

An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.

Active awards, plus pending awards whose standstill has ended or was not published.

28 awards (26 for a named lot, 93%, 2 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 28 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

8510 Health services4 awards · 14% · 3 awards naming a lot + 1 whole-procedure awards
7221 Programming services of packaged software products1 awards · 4% · awards naming a lot
8530 Social work and related services1 awards · 4% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£12mOn 2 of 30 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Award vs estimate
i

Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.

Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.

Based on 2 wins across all categories. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.

6.7% below estimateindicative · n=2compared within all comparable wins
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
NCCT43137 - Technology Enabled CareNorfolk County Council24 Oct 20253 yrs · up to 5 yrs£11,183,028
≈ £3.7m/yr
Video Carephones and Virtual Care AgencyNorfolk County Council——£349,640 †

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 11 of 11 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

East Midlands3 procedures · 27%
West Midlands2 procedures · 18%
East of England2 procedures · 18%
Greater London2 procedures · 18%
North East England1 procedures · 9%
Scotland1 procedures · 9%

Bidding record
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 4 notices name this supplier since 19 Dec 2025 · observed bids, not an estimate

Win rate on contract lots
i

How often this supplier wins when it bids.

Won divided by won plus lost, counted per LOT on Procurement Act 2023 notices naming every bidder. Framework places are counted separately.

Real bids, but only where the buyer named the bidders.

33%moderate · n=3Won 1, lost 2 of the contract lots with a published award. A lot is one contest, so bidding for several lots of one notice counts once for each.
Framework / DPS places
i

Frameworks and DPS this supplier got onto.

Lots appointed out of lots applied for. Kept apart from contract wins because almost every compliant bidder gets a place.

1 of 1
Authorities bid for
i

How many public bodies this supplier has bid to.

Buyers on notices that name it as a bidder, win or lose.

4Bid for and never won with 2 of them on contract lots.

Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Type not classified71%(20 awards)
    20 of 28 awards are Type not classified (71%).
  • Local authority14%(4 awards)
    4 of 28 awards are Local authority (14%).
  • Other public body14%(4 awards)
    4 of 28 awards are Other public body (14%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
WM5G LIMITEDframework/DPS on 2218.2%621 Jan 2026
ESPOframework/DPS on 2218.2%416 Oct 2025
Norfolk County Council218.2%224 Oct 2025
Scotland Excelframework/DPS on 119.1%1412 Jul 2024
Northern Housing Consortium Ltdframework/DPS on 119.1%14 Jan 2024
London Borough of Barking and Dagenhamframework/DPS on 119.1%11 May 2026
North Northamptonshire Councilframework/DPS on 119.1%119 Mar 2024
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Officeframework/DPS on 119.1%124 Jul 2026

Share = of the 11 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

21 of 30 awards carry an end date, 14 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent awards

Latest 30 of 30 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Lot 2b Software as a Service (Saas)Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office24 Jul 2026£14,000,000,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 2744 appointed suppliers
All-Age Care Technology ServiceLondon Borough of Barking and Dagenham1 May 2026£4,003,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 2 appointed suppliers
TEC Enabled Discharge Monitoring ServiceWM5G LIMITED21 Jan 2026£3,750,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 21 appointed suppliers
Lot 1. Virtual/Tech Enabled Health & Care Technology SolutionsWM5G LIMITED21 Jan 2026£3,750,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 43 appointed suppliers
Lot 1: Virtual Care Technology Solutions (e.g. platforms, remote monitoring tools, apps)WM5G LIMITED15 Jan 2026£3,750,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 43 appointed suppliers
TEC Enabled Discharge Monitoring ServiceWM5G LIMITED15 Jan 2026£3,750,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 22 appointed suppliers
NCCT43137 - Technology Enabled CareNorfolk County Council24 Oct 2025£11,183,028
Tech Enabled Discharge; Remote Monitoring TechWM5G LIMITEDNot published£2,100,000 †
dynamic market estimate · not attributable revenue
Tech Enabled Discharge; Remote Monitoring TechWM5G LIMITEDNot published£1,400,000 †
dynamic market estimate · not attributable revenue
Lot 1.1 - Technology Enabled Care (Telecare) products and associated servicesESPONot published£5,600,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 22 appointed suppliers
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 7 of 30 awards, estimated from the published duration on 14 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.