Jerram Falkus Construction Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
Companies House: Private Limited Company·Companies House status: In Administration·London·Nationwide (UK)·Main market: Building construction work
Companies House00820289 ↗
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
20 awards (15 for a named lot, 75%, 5 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 20 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
4521 Building construction work1 awards · 5% · awards naming a loti
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
i
Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.
Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.
Based on 1 wins in its industry (CPV division 45). Small sample.
A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wanstead Leisure Centre and Wanstead High School Development | London Borough of Redbridge | — | — | £13,514,768 † |
| Beckenham Car Park Housing Scheme Main Contractor | London Borough of Bromley | 21 Jan 2026 | 2.6 yrs | £12,371,126 ≈ £4.8m/yr |
| RBGKEW1297 - Learning Centre | Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew | — | — | £8,490,000 † |
| Design & Construction of Apartment Building | London Borough of Bexley | — | — | £6,000,000 † |
| P5616 Design and Build of 19 New Homes at Shetland Road Garage Site | Tower Hamlets | — | — | £5,442,049 † |
Where their buyers arei
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 10 of 10 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Bidding recordi
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
i
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 2 notices name this supplier since 4 Mar 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate
i
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
i
How many public bodies this supplier has bid to.
Buyers on notices that name it as a bidder, win or lose.
| Notice | Authority | Outcome | Bidders | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beckenham Car Park Housing Scheme Main Contractor | London Borough of Bromley | won | 12 | 16 Jun 2026 |
| Bellegrove Main Works Contractor | London Borough of Bromley | lost | 4 | 4 Mar 2026 |
Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Type not classified75%(15 awards)
15 of 20 awards are Type not classified (75%).Local authority25%(5 awards)
5 of 20 awards are Local authority (25%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHC | 1 | 10% | 8 | 2 Sept 2022 |
| Watford Community Housing | 1 | 10% | 4 | 26 Jun 2023 |
| London Borough of Redbridge | 1 | 10% | 1 | 28 Sept 2022 |
| London Borough of Bromley | 1 | 10% | 1 | 21 Jan 2026 |
| Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew | 1 | 10% | 1 | 8 Nov 2024 |
| London Borough of Bexley | 1 | 10% | 1 | 8 Nov 2021 |
| Tower Hamlets | 1 | 10% | 1 | 26 Mar 2021 |
| London Borough of Haringey | 1 | 10% | 1 | 4 Jul 2025 |
Share = of the 10 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Recent awards
Latest 20 of 20 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 1 of 20 awards, estimated from the published duration on 12 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.