Zoological Society of London: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Large organisationCompanies House: Royal Charter CompanyLondonGreater LondonMain market: Consultative engineering and construction services

Official UK PPONPLMW-5186-XMWR

Procedures with an award78 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities7named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£401knet · on 5 of 8 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months5awards · 2 in the prior 24 months · last 15 Oct 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months3end date on 8 of 8 awards · 1 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions5most often East of England
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.

An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.

Active awards, plus pending awards whose standstill has ended or was not published.

8 awards (8 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 8 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

7131 Consultative engineering and construction services2 awards · 25% · awards naming a lot
5512 Hotel meeting and conference services1 award · 13% · awards naming a lot
5524 Holiday centre and holiday home services1 award · 13% · awards naming a lot
7740 Zoological services1 award · 13% · awards naming a lot
7931 Market research services1 award · 13% · awards naming a lot
9070 Environmental services1 award · 13% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£401kOn 5 of 8 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i

What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

£53k middle valuerobust · n=5
Award vs estimate
i

Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.

Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.

Based on 1 wins across all categories. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.

8.5% below estimateindicative · n=1compared within all comparable wins
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
MoA - Disease Risk Analysis & Health Surveillance for the Species Recovery ProgNATURAL ENGLAND (Defra Network eTendering Portal)4 Aug 20257 mo · up to 1.6 yrs£232,890
ES RDE 173 - Native Oyster Restoration Waterbody Prioritisation studyENVIRONMENT AGENCY—5 mo£59,831 †
Nature Based Solutions Programme M4 Frogs Ditch Feasibility StudyNational Highways Limited—5 mo£52,765 †
Provision of Feasibility Report investigating potential reinforcement of the Chough population on Islay and Colonsay.Argyll and the Isles Coast and Countryside Trust (ACT)——£36,845 †
CSP27898 - ConferenceUK Research and Innovation——£18,776 †

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 7 of 7 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

East of England2 procedures · 29%
Greater London2 procedures · 29%
West Midlands1 procedure · 14%
South West England1 procedure · 14%
Scotland1 procedure · 14%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Central government63%(5 awards)
    5 of 8 awards are Central government (63%).
  • Local authority13%(1 award)
    1 of 8 awards is Local authority (13%).
  • Other public body13%(1 award)
    1 of 8 awards is Other public body (13%).
  • Type not classified13%(1 award)
    1 of 8 awards is Type not classified (13%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
JNCC SUPPORT COframework/DPS on 1114.3%210 Sept 2026
NATURAL ENGLAND (Defra Network eTendering Portal)114.3%14 Aug 2025
ENVIRONMENT AGENCY114.3%115 Oct 2026
National Highways Limited114.3%112 Jan 2026
Argyll and the Isles Coast and Countryside Trust (ACT)114.3%19 Dec 2024
UK Research and Innovation114.3%11 Oct 2026
Central Bedfordshire Councilframework/DPS on 1114.3%113 Oct 2022

Share = of the 7 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

8 of 8 awards carry an end date, 1 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

ContractEndsPublished value
ES RDE 173 - Native Oyster Restoration Waterbody Prioritisation study31 Mar 2027£59,831
CSP27898 - Conference14 Apr 2027£18,776
Lot 1 - Youth Activities17 Sept 2027 estimated£600,000

Recent awards

Latest 8 of 8 award records naming this supplier

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 7 of 8 awards, estimated from the published duration on 1 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.