Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 14 Sept 2026, 14:03 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Online Digital Catalogue and Archive Management Solutions (ERO Online Digital Catalogue)

Authority: Essex County Council (Local council)

ServicesSME suitable
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 5 yrsends 1 Apr 2032 · up to 1 Apr 2035 with extensions · starts 1 Apr 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Description

Essex Record Office (ERO) is seeking to engage with the market to understand available solutions and supplier capabilities that can support the modernisation of its archive management, digital preservation and public access services.

ERO is undertaking this Preliminary Market Engagement (PME) exercise to inform future procurement activity and ensure that any proposed solutions align with the organisation's statutory responsibilities, service requirements and long-term digital preservation ambitions.

ERO is looking to understand the market's ability to provide solutions that can deliver the following outcomes:

  • Replacement of the current in-house developed Archive Management System (SEAX), which underpins over 80% of ERO's operations and public-facing services, including income-generating online services.
  • The archive management system will need to:

o facilitate viewing the catalogue on-site at Essex Record Office locations and online

o provide free access to digital and digitised collections on-site at Essex Record Office locations

o provide online access, outside of ERO locations, to digital and digitised collections via a subscription service

o facilitate the creation of user accounts with role dependent security/access levels

o provide a paywall to access certain collections

o manage the personal data of users of the service, including taking payments from them

  • Support for statutory archive, records management and civil registration functions.
  • Secure, scalable and standards-compliant digital preservation capabilities to support the long-term preservation, integrity and accessibility of digital records. We require a solution for preserving digital records with retention periods of 100 years or more, as well as potentially shorter retention periods. The solution must be able to deal with a variety of file formats including proprietary software files and a range of sound and moving image files.
  • Progression towards National Digital Stewardship Alliance (NDSA) Level 4 digital preservation maturity. Specifically, we require:

o For digital records storage: three copies in at least two geographic locations (storage will need to be in the UK or EU)

o A means of controlling, auditing, and recording file permissions

o A means of recording sufficient metadata about the files using an appropriate metadata standard e.g. METS (Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard), PREMIS (PREservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies), BagIt (BagIt File Packaging Format) and/or Dublin Core

o Periodic integrity checking and disaster simulation, and a means of regularly updating the results of these checks

o A means of recording details of people and software that have accessed or taken preservation actions on files.

  • Improved management and discovery of digital assets through modern digital asset management capabilities.
  • Enhanced public access, search and discovery through modern online archive and catalogue services.
  • Improved customer journeys and increased public engagement.
  • Support for current income generating services and potential for enhanced income generation opportunities.
  • Integration capabilities with existing and future corporate platforms and digital services.
  • Modern, intuitive and user-friendly interfaces for both staff and public users. As a minimum, we will need:

o The ability to allow members of the public to access suitable digital preservation files

o A means of providing redacted access copies of the content where necessary

o A means of recording when files have been accessed and by whom

o A means of ensuring the content is protected from unauthorised changes and any loss

  • Scalable architecture capable of supporting current digital holdings of 88.8TB and significant future growth over the coming decades.
  • Strong governance, audit, compliance and security features to support statutory and regulatory requirements, including the Public Records Act, Freedom of Information legislation and Data Protection requirements.

Background

Archive Management System

It is estimated that over 80% of the work of the ERO is currently managed through an in-house developed tool called SEAX. SEAX was created by Essex County Council as a bespoke system. It was created over 25 years ago in a now archaic programming language. Seax Explorer was written in VB (Visual Basic) and uses forms to create the different screens of its various modules (e.g. Catalogue Manager, Accession Manager, etc.). These forms have been written in a custom language based loosely around XML and are stored within the Seax Explorer database.

The online element of the system is known internally as Seax PAM and to the public as Essex Archives Online. This includes our online catalogue and income-generating subscription service and income-generating single-image service. Seax PAM was written using .NET framework and C# and is currently using an old version of .NET framework.

We are seeking a modern, sustainable and future-proofed solution for managing our requirements for accessioning, cataloguing, storage locations, document production, reader management and user access (at the ERO and online).

The ERO has a staff of around 25 people. Up to 12 users are likely to require login access to the staff side of the AMS, including generic logins for Searchroom staff, document production staff, volunteers, etc.

Digital Preservation

As of July 2026, the ERO has 88.8TB of digital data. This figure is expected to grow at an estimated rate of 5TB per year. Within the 88.8TB of data, 3.3TB consists of born-digital records; the other 85.5TB being content the ERO has digitised from its manuscript, image, sound and video collections. This data is all currently stored on Microsoft Azure Cloud Storage.

Most of the content is listed in basic form on a spreadsheet. Detailed metadata at file level is being added as resources allow. Further documentation about rights is kept in separate filing and on our archive management system (alongside information about our paper and analogue collections). The ERO has a dedicated ingest PC through which we process digital collections as they arrive. We are able to take images of disks using ISO Buster software, transfer files as they are or transfer them to a file format with greater longevity. Transfers can be made using Teracopy software and we can interrogate the files we receive using TNA’s Droid software.

The main element of NDSA (National Digital Stewardship Alliance) Digital Preservation Level 1 we are not currently achieving is the requirement to have two complete copies of our digital content in separate locations.

Our aim is to progress through the NDSA digital preservation levels to meet NDSA Level 4.

Areas of Interest

ERO is particularly interested in understanding solutions relating to:

  • Archive Management Systems (AMS)
  • Digital Preservation Management Systems (DPMS)
  • Digital Asset Management Systems (DAMS)
  • Preservation storage and hosting solutions
  • Public catalogue and online archive access platforms
  • Migration services from legacy archive systems
  • Integration and API capabilities

Contract Considerations

At this stage, ERO is seeking supplier feedback on:

  • Appropriate contract lengths and commercial models
  • Implementation and migration timelines
  • SaaS, cloud-hosted and hybrid delivery models
  • Opportunities for phased delivery across AMS, DPMS, DAMS and public access capabilities
  • Scalability to support long-term digital preservation requirements.

The information gathered through this PME will help shape ERO's future procurement strategy, solution design and business case development.

CPV: Archiving services · Data storage services · Database services · Database systems · Document management services · Information systems · Library, archives, museums and other cultural services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1PlannedRenewal 5 yrsSME
Contract period: 1 Apr 2027 – 1 Apr 2032 (5 yrs) · up to 1 Apr 2035 with extensions
Delivery: East of EnglandEligibility: SME eligible
Extensions: Extension options published

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Essex County Council buys Data-processing services (CPV 7231), and who usually turns up

Essex County Council’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Data-processing services (CPV 7231) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerEssex County Council · division 72
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 8 of 14 known-size awards · market: CPV 7231 · East of England, n=22
57%18%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in East of England.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 6 of 25 known-location awards · market: CPV 7231 · East of England, n=20
24%5%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: CPV 7231 · UK-wide, n=15
—49 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 49 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 15 of 27 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 7231 · East of England, n=27
56%63%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer5 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 72
0% had one bid
The market29 lots with bid counts · CPV 7231 · UK-wide
17% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid0% / 17%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 5 of 29 lots with published bid counts.
2–320% / 31%
Buyer: 1 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 9 of 29 lots with published bid counts.
4–640% / 34%
Buyer: 2 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 10 of 29 lots with published bid counts.
7+40% / 17%
Buyer: 2 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 5 of 29 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer58 lots with estimate and award · all categories
38% below estimate
The market5 lots with estimate and award · CPV 7231 · East of England
100% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate38% / 100%
Buyer: 22 of 58 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 5 of 5 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%55% / 0%
Buyer: 32 of 58 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 0 of 5 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate7% / 0%
Buyer: 4 of 58 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 0 of 5 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 799960 monthsSME suitableEstimate not published

This lot is listed as CPV 7999. The table above uses the notice category.

Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 18 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet17% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 18 similar lots
1 bid17%
3 of 18 similar past lots received 1 bid (17%).
2–322%
4 of 18 similar past lots received 2–3 (22%).
4–639%
7 of 18 similar past lots received 4–6 (39%).
7+22%
4 of 18 similar past lots received 7+ (22%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4.5 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
14 Sept 2026, 14:03 BST
Last source update
14 Sept 2026, 14:03 BST
Authority reference
D142PA
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-086898
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Archiving servicesData storage servicesDatabase servicesDatabase systemsDocument management servicesInformation systemsLibrary, archives, museums and other cultural services
Delivery area
East of England (UKH3)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06f937 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

14 Sept 2026 → 1 Apr 2027 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published44 days ago
    14 Sept 2026, 14:03 BST
  2. Market engagement23 days ago
    6 Oct 2026, 00:59 BST

    Essex Record Office (ERO) is inviting interested suppliers with relevant solutions and services to complete an early market engagement questionnaire. The information gathered will help ERO further develop its requirements, understand available market offerings and shape any future procurement approach.

    Please note the contract dates and possible extension dates listed in this Preliminary Market Engagement notice (PME) are estimates only and we are seeking feedback on suggested contract duration as part of this PME.

    Suppliers are invited to provide information relating to the areas within the scope of this notice by completing our Early Market Questionnaire via the Microsoft Forms link below.

    forms.cloud.microsoft/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx ↗

    Responses need to be submitted by 05 October 2026 at 5pm. If you are having any issues using the link, please contact us.

    Following a review of the responses, ERO may invite interested suppliers to participate in follow-up discussions, product demonstrations and/or solution workshops to further explore capabilities and alignment with service requirements. These sessions may be conducted virtually via Microsoft Teams or in person at Essex County Council offices.

    Please note this Preliminary Market Engagement (PME) notice/request for information is not intended as a call for competition, and as such you will need to express your interest in any potential future tender opportunity. Responding to this PME does not constitute a tender submission, a quotation, or any binding commitment to procure these services. Please note there is no commitment or guarantee that procurement activity will go ahead.

    Participation is voluntary and will neither benefit nor disadvantage any supplier in any potential future procurement opportunity. Responses to the questionnaire will be treated confidentially.

  3. Today
    29 Oct 2026
  4. Contract startsin 153 days
    1 Apr 2027

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    14 Sept 2026, 14:03 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Essex County Council

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PWVM-4844-NRQH County Hall, Market Road, Chelmsford, East of England, CM1 1QHContact email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure