LEEDS TRINITY UNIVERSITY: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LBG/NSC (Private, Limited by guarantee, no share capital, use of 'Limited' exemption)DfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationYorkshire and the HumberLeeds

Companies House06305220 ↗Websiteleedstrinity.ac.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months22+83% vs prior 12 months (12)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share15%of 41 awarded procedures · 51 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

41 awarded tenders, 51 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months154 within 6 months · 5 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£1.3mnet · on 14 of 14 published values · top 5 = 73%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 34 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract97%(33 notices)
    33 of 34 notices are Contract (97%).
  • Framework3%(1 notice)
    1 of 34 notices is Framework (3%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award47%(16 notices)
    16 of 34 notices are Direct award (47%).
  • Limited / restricted21%(7 notices)
    7 of 34 notices are Limited / restricted (21%).
  • Route not published21%(7 notices)
    7 of 34 notices are Route not published (21%).
  • Open9%(3 notices)
    3 of 34 notices are Open (9%).
  • Selective3%(1 notice)
    1 of 34 notices is Selective (3%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

7indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 34 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

02 of 34 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

6.7% below estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 15% of 41 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 51 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.3mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 14 of 14 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 73%; a further 11 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£50k middle valuerobust · n=14Middle half £30k–£83k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
HR SystemMHR International UK Limited——£547,000 †
Sophos MDRPhoenix Software Ltd——£162,000 †
Copyright Licensing Agency fees 2026-27THE COPYRIGHT LICENSING AGENCY LTD—1 yrs£108,030 †
≈ £108k/yr
Consultancy Services - Strategic Project ManagementTRUPEAK CONSULTING LTD—3 mo · up to 1.3 yrs£83,220 †
Business Management ConsultancyAPPOYAR SERVICES LIMITED—8 mo · up to 1.2 yrs£81,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

36 of 49 contracts carry an end date, 12 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 15 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 60 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Executive RecruitmentAwarded / complete1 Oct 2026—
Business Management ConsultancyAwarded / complete24 Aug 2026—
Water HygieneAwarded / complete13 Aug 2026—
ERA licenceAwarded / complete12 Aug 2026—
Mail Services - UK/InlandAwarded / complete5 Aug 2026—
Library management system and discovery serviceAwarded / complete4 Aug 2026—
Copyright Licensing Agency fees 2026-27Awarded / complete4 Aug 2026—
In-Region Representative Support Services for International Student RecruitmentFramework3 lotsHigher education servicesOpen29 Jul 2026£3,674,080
Proofpoint RenewalAwarded / complete25 Jun 2026—
Sophos MDRSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete3 Jun 2026—
Lecture Capture SoftwareSoftware package and information systemsPlanning18 May 2026—
Personal Portfolio Assessment - NursingAwarded / complete18 May 2026—
Entrepreneur in residenceAwarded / complete20 Apr 2026—
E-Tendering PlatformProcurement software packagePlanning10 Apr 2026—
Financial Risk Assessment ToolFinancial analysis software packagePlanning10 Apr 2026—
Financial Consultancy ServicesAwarded / complete5 Mar 2026—
Employee Engagement PlatformHuman resources management consultancy servicesAwarded / complete9 Feb 2026£180,000
Audit and TrainingAwarded / complete15 Dec 2025—
Consultancy - Degree Award AlgorithmEvaluation consultancy servicesPlanning12 Dec 2025—
Management Consultancy APIP and Commercial ServicesAwarded / complete2 Dec 2025—

Search all 60 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 36 of 49 published contracts have an end date; 12 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.