National Heritage Memorial Fund: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)·GOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public body·Greater London·London
Companies House13915301 ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
16 awarded tenders, 148 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
45 Construction work7 procedures · 88%50 Repair and maintenance services7 procedures · 88%71 Architectural, construction, engineering4 procedures · 50% · 1 open79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting4 procedures · 50% · 1 open77 Agricultural, forestry, horticultural services2 procedures · 25% · 1 open90 Sewage, refuse, cleaning and environmental2 procedures · 25% · 1 open31 Electrical machinery2 procedures · 25%33 Medical equipments, pharmaceuticals2 procedures · 25%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 8 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Framework100%(8 notices)
8 of 8 notices are Framework (100%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open75%(6 notices)
6 of 8 notices are Open (75%).Route not published25%(2 notices)
2 of 8 notices are Route not published (25%).
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 8 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD Building Services Ltd | 5 | 31.3% | 3 | 20 | — |
| Saltash Enterprises Ltd | 5 | 31.3% | 3 | 17 | — |
| IAN WILLIAMS | 4 | 25% | 2 | 20 | — |
| Purdy Contracts Limited | 4 | 25% | 2 | 16 | — |
| Axis Europe | 4 | 25% | 2 | 15 | — |
| CHIGWELL (LONDON) PLC | 4 | 25% | 2 | 10 | — |
| CARDO (WALES & WEST) LIMITED | 4 | 25% | 1 | 16 | — |
| CLC Contractors Ltd | 4 | 25% | 0 | 16 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 38% of 16 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 148 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
317 of 607 contracts carry an end date, 317 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
Soonest 10 of 308 contracts ending within 18 months.
Recent procedures
Latest 33 of 33 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 317 of 607 published contracts have an end date; 317 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.