Surrey Heath Borough Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authoritySouth East EnglandCamberley

Official UK PPONPQQL-9321-BBQX

Open now1next deadline 11 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months26+30% vs prior 12 months (20)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot38.3% single-bid · 12 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 12 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share21%of 39 awarded procedures · 45 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

39 awarded tenders, 45 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months114 within 6 months · 3 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£4.4mnet · on 34 of 34 published values · top 5 = 53%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Theatre Event Management Software11 Nov 202614d£38,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 46 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(46 notices)
    46 of 46 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open85%(39 notices)
    39 of 46 notices are Open (85%).
  • Direct award9%(4 notices)
    4 of 46 notices are Direct award (9%).
  • Route not published4%(2 notices)
    2 of 46 notices are Route not published (4%).
  • Limited / restricted2%(1 notice)
    1 of 46 notices is Limited / restricted (2%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 12 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=128.3% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 16 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

32 daysrobust · n=16
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 46 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

132 of 46 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 11 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=11

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
BTU (INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE) LIMITED410.3%34—
Cemplas Waterproofing & Concrete Repairs Ltd25.1%22—
Q3 services Group Limited25.1%1213 May 2026
AECOM LIMITED12.6%11—
GREENS PRINTING SERVICES LIMITED12.6%11—
MALTBY ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED12.6%11—
Chase Services Group Ltd12.6%1115 Jan 2026
John Rowan & Partners LLP12.6%1123 Jul 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 21% of 39 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 45 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£4.4mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 34 of 34 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 53%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£64k middle valuerobust · n=34Middle half £37k–£139k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Cleaning Services for Corporate PropertiesN-viro Limited6 Oct 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£1,050,000
≈ £350k/yr
Static Guarding and Reception Security Services, CCTV Monitoring, ad hoc Event Security, Key Holding, Alarm Response, ad hoc Mobile PatrolsChase Services Group Ltd15 Jan 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£595,000
≈ £198k/yr
Concrete Skatepark and Wheeled Sports Facility, Crabtree Park CamberleyMaverick Industries Ltd14 Sept 20266 mo£260,000
Automatic Opening Vents Remedial Works SQ Shopping Centre CamberleyBTU (INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE) LIMITED——£207,548 †
Hybrid Mail ServicesDatagraphic Limited15 Jul 20253 yrs · up to 5 yrs£200,000
≈ £67k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

35 of 37 contracts carry an end date, 4 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 11 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 53 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Christmas Decoration Design, Hire, Installation and Removal, Maintenance and StorageChristmas treeAwarded / complete22 Jul 2025£90,000
Pre-Market Engagement for Managed Padel Tennis FacilityRecreationalPlanning18 Jul 2025£1
3G Pitch and Maintenance Equipment and LED Floodlights3 lotsArtificial grassAwarded / complete11 Jul 2025£265,000
Provision of an Annual IT Health Check (ITHC) for Public Services Network (PSN) complianceCompliance software packageAwarded / complete25 Jun 2025£7,000
Festival Technical ProductionEvent servicesAwarded / complete9 May 2025£20,000
Ashwood House Public Realm Works including Arnold Walk and High Street RemedialsConstructionAwarded / complete16 Aug 2024£400,000
Maintenance Activities in the Square Shopping Centre, Camberley GU15 3SPConstruction materialsAwarded / complete19 Jul 2024£300,000
Framework for Commercial Agency ServicesFramework3 lotsCommercial property management servicesAwarded / complete9 Aug 2023£1,400,000
Provision of Ticketless Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) Car Park Control and Management System and MaintenanceCar park management servicesOpen20 Mar 2023£30,000

Search all 53 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 35 of 37 published contracts have an end date; 4 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.