The Royal Mint: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Companies House: Private Limited Company·GOV.UK register: Other·Central government·Wales (Cymru)·Pontyclun
Companies House06964873 ↗Websiteroyalmint.com ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
Open notices
2 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build
| Notice | Deadline | Days left | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Printed Packaging | 20 Nov 2026 | 24d | £7,500,000 |
| Supply of WEE Electronic Waste to The Royal Mint | 31 Mar 2027 | 154d | — |
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
30 Office and computing machinery2 procedures · 17%50 Repair and maintenance services2 procedures · 17%79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting2 procedures · 17%22 Printed matter and related products1 procedure · 8% · 1 open14 Mining, basic metals and related products1 procedure · 8%31 Electrical machinery1 procedure · 8%38 Laboratory, optical and precision1 procedure · 8%42 Industrial machinery1 procedure · 8%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 12 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract100%(12 notices)
12 of 12 notices are Contract (100%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open67%(8 notices)
8 of 12 notices are Open (67%).Selective25%(3 notices)
3 of 12 notices are Selective (25%).Route not published8%(1 notice)
1 of 12 notices is Route not published (8%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 12 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deloitte | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 1 | 27 Mar 2026 |
| Compressor Systems (Wales) | 1 | 11.1% | 0 | 1 | — |
| Candyspace Media Limited | 1 | 11.1% | 0 | 1 | — |
| Nicholas Associates Limited t/a Stafforce | 1 | 11.1% | 0 | 1 | — |
| Brink’s Ltd | 1 | 11.1% | 0 | 1 | — |
| Loomis International (UK) Ltd | 1 | 11.1% | 0 | 1 | — |
| Malca-Amit (UK) Ltd | 1 | 11.1% | 0 | 1 | — |
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | 1 | 11.1% | 0 | 1 | — |
9 awarded procedures across 16 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate Tax Compliance and Related Services | Deloitte | 27 Mar 2026 | 3 yrs · up to 5 yrs | £250,000 ≈ £83k/yr |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
11 of 11 contracts carry an end date, 10 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Holder | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| The provision of Digital and Technology services for the Royal Mint. | Candyspace Media Limited | 6 Jan 2027 estimated | £1,000,000 |
| Timber Transit Packaging (Boxes and Pallets) for The Royal Mint | Pontrilas Packaging Ltd | 11 May 2027 estimated | £4,000,000 |
| Provision of External Audit Services | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | 3 Mar 2028 estimated | £500,000 |
Recent procedures
Latest 50 of 67 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 11 of 11 published contracts have an end date; 10 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.