University of Cumbria: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LBG/NSC (Private, Limited by guarantee, no share capital, use of 'Limited' exemption)DfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationNorth West England-Carlisle

Companies House06033238 ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months38+15% vs prior 12 months (33)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot5.530% single-bid · 10 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 10 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share9%of 81 awarded procedures · 80 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

81 awarded tenders, 80 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months151 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£8.2mnet · on 52 of 52 published values · top 5 = 30%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 71 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract97%(69 notices)
    69 of 71 notices are Contract (97%).
  • Framework3%(2 notices)
    2 of 71 notices are Framework (3%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published30%(21 notices)
    21 of 71 notices are Route not published (30%).
  • Direct award28%(20 notices)
    20 of 71 notices are Direct award (28%).
  • Limited / restricted21%(15 notices)
    15 of 71 notices are Limited / restricted (21%).
  • Open21%(15 notices)
    15 of 71 notices are Open (21%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 10 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

5.5robust · n=1030% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 10 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

32 daysrobust · n=10
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 71 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

012 of 71 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 7 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

16.2% below estimaterobust · n=7

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Cumbria Mechanical & Plumbing Ltd33.7%3326 Feb 2026
Gresham Office Furniture Limited22.5%2330 Jun 2025
Logicalis UK Limited22.5%22—
Hla Services Ltd22.5%228 Sept 2026
Herbert Kasozi22.5%228 May 2026
Jisc Services Ltd22.5%22—
ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY LTD22.5%22—
Phoenix Software Ltd22.5%12—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 9% of 81 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 80 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£8.2mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 52 of 52 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 30%; a further 17 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£116k middle valuerobust · n=52Middle half £55k–£196k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Digital Workspace SolutionsTET LTD—4 yrs · up to 6 yrs£599,165
≈ £150k/yr
Supply of a Student Management System (SMS) & Associated ServicesTribal Education Limited—5 yrs£571,378
≈ £114k/yr
Microsoft Enrolment for Education SolutionsPhoenix Software Ltd——£522,385 †
Library Management SystemEx Libris UK Ltd.——£430,036 †
Water Treatment-V2Integrated Water Services Ltd—3 yrs · up to 5 yrs£367,317 †
≈ £122k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

61 of 81 contracts carry an end date, 4 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 15 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 96 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Occupational Health Services (Staff)Awarded / complete20 Oct 2026—
Water and Waste Water ServicesOperation of water suppliesAwarded / complete7 Oct 2026—
Provision of a new boiler system in the Skiddaw Building at Fusehill Street Campus,CarlisleBoiler installation workAwarded / complete8 Sept 2026£250,000
Apprenticeship Management SoftwareSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete24 Aug 2026—
Fire Doors Betterment-Replacement ProgrammeAwarded / complete24 Aug 2026—
Asbestos Annual Condition SurveysSurveying servicesAwarded / complete11 Aug 2026£25,000
Fire Damper, Inspection, Testing and MaintenanceAwarded / complete11 Aug 2026—
Blencathra BoilerBoiler installation workAwarded / complete10 Aug 2026£250,000
Timetabling Package & Maintenance Syllabus Plus Software LicenceAwarded / complete10 Aug 2026—
CISCO Hardware SupportAwarded / complete10 Aug 2026—
Combined Higher Education PolicyAwarded / complete5 Aug 2026—
27-SSJ-04Awarded / complete4 Aug 2026—
Network Connectivity and TelecommunicationsNetwork connectivity terminal emulation software packageAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
Postage ServicesAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
SSJ-SchillerAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
Library Management SystemLibrary management servicesAwarded / complete27 Jul 2026—
Mobile Image EquipmentAwarded / complete24 Jul 2026—
Refurbishment of Campus GymsAwarded / complete24 Jul 2026—
Content Creator with the Innovation for Conservation (ICON) ProgrammeAwarded / complete21 Jul 2026—
Material Damage and Business Interruption PolicyAwarded / complete20 Jul 2026—

Search all 96 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 61 of 81 published contracts have an end date; 4 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.