Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentYorkshire and the HumberWakefield

Official UK PPONPXHX-4264-BLQJWebsiteyas.nhs.net ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months64+146% vs prior 12 months (26)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot30% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share14%of 85 awarded procedures · 80 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

85 awarded tenders, 80 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months5035 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£9.1mnet · on 80 of 80 published values · top 5 = 74%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 90 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract98%(88 notices)
    88 of 90 notices are Contract (98%).
  • Framework2%(2 notices)
    2 of 90 notices are Framework (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award68%(61 notices)
    61 of 90 notices are Direct award (68%).
  • Open19%(17 notices)
    17 of 90 notices are Open (19%).
  • Limited / restricted12%(11 notices)
    11 of 90 notices are Limited / restricted (12%).
  • Route not published1%(1 notice)
    1 of 90 notices is Route not published (1%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=50% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 8 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

57 daysrobust · n=8
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 90 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

013 of 90 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Ortus Technology Ltd55.9%5711 Dec 2025
Bluelight UK Ltd (Backup Provider)44.7%468 May 2025
Octane Holding Group Ltd33.5%3429 Apr 2025
RUTH LEE LIMITED22.4%2426 Feb 2026
EMERGENCY EVACUATION EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING LIMITED22.4%2419 Mar 2026
speedings ltd22.4%2419 May 2025
Herida Healthcare Ltd22.4%2419 Mar 2026
Limbs & Things Limited22.4%2415 Dec 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 14% of 85 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 80 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£9.1mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 80 of 80 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 74%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£16k middle valuerobust · n=80Middle half £10k–£45k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Common CAD SystemMIS Emergency Systems—5 yrs · up to 7 yrs£3,539,665 †
≈ £708k/yr
YAS 44 2026_27 End Point Assessment Organisation for ASW and AAP ApprenticesFuture (Awards and Qualifications) Ltd25 Sept 20263.9 yrs£1,600,000
≈ £409k/yr
YAS 65 2026_27 (DA Non FW) Ortus Parts Call Off AgreementOrtus Technology Ltd—1 yrs£588,031 †
≈ £588k/yr
YAS 353 2024_25 JRCLALC LicencesClass Publishing4 Mar 20252.8 yrs£518,256
≈ £188k/yr
YAS 17 2025_26 Provision of Physiotherapy ServicesSano Physiotherapy LTD13 Oct 20262 yrs · up to 5 yrs£500,000
≈ £250k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

73 of 81 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 50 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 97 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
YAS 17 2026_27 Provision of Physiotherapy ServicesHealth servicesAwarded / complete13 Oct 2026£500,000
YAS 169 2026_27 (DA Non FW) 5 x R7 Atex UHF Non-Keypad with Single ChargerAwarded / complete9 Oct 2026—
Vouchers for flu vaccine programmeAwarded / complete6 Oct 2026—
E PortfolioEducation and training servicesOpen2 Oct 2026£110,000
Centricity Server, Autodialler, Pilot Licences, & ACCR SupportIT services: consultingAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
Totara (Learn and Perform) Learning Management SystemIT software packageAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
Mass Communication ToolSoftware support servicesAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
YAS 47 2026_27 Apprenticeship Management SystemEducation and training servicesAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026£150,000
End Point Assessment Organisation for ASW and AAP ApprenticesEducation and training servicesAwarded / complete30 Sept 2026£1,600,000
YAS 02 2025_26 C1 Driver Training FrameworkFrameworkEducation and training servicesAwarded / complete26 Aug 2026£2,000,000
YAS 161 2025_26 Finance and Procurement SystemFinancial systems software packageAwarded / complete24 Aug 2026£742,800
Managed Print ServiceOffice machineryAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
NICE WFM Cloud Solution MigrationSoftware supply servicesAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
YAS 95 2026_27 (DA Non FW) Combined Restraints with CarabinersAwarded / complete22 Jul 2026—
YAS 93 2026_27 (DA Non FW) Questech Recruitment Finders Fee Aron FirthAwarded / complete22 Jul 2026—
YAS 78 (DA Non FW) Fleet Mechanic Daniel MasonAwarded / complete14 Jul 2026—
YAS 77 (DA Non FW) Fleet Mechanic Anthony SpinkAwarded / complete14 Jul 2026—
YAS 24 2026_27 (DA Non FW) Paint Charges DCA VehiclesAwarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
YAS 47 2026_27 Apprenticeship Management SystemEducation and training servicesPlanned1 Jul 2026£150,000
YAS 23 2026_27 (DA Non FW) Software Licenses for Bunkered Fuel SitesAwarded / complete19 Jun 2026—

Search all 97 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 73 of 81 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.