Railway transport services: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition

CPV 60200000Services · classin Transport & Passenger Services

Open now4open for bids now · see them in the search
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months209 contracting authorities · 94 in the catalogue
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical contract value£1,200,000middle value of 13 contract awards, net · not frameworks
i

What a contract here is usually worth.

Middle value of published award values, VAT excluded. Framework ceilings are left out because they are not real contract values.

Based on 13 awards with a usable value, last 36 months.

Published values, not actual spend.

Last 36 months.

Newest open tenders

2 of 4 open for bids now · newest first

NoticeAuthorityDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Rail Haulage3 lotsNETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED2 Dec 202638d£949,900,000
Operation of RIDC MeltonFrameworkNETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED25 Nov 202630d£29,386,811 ceiling

See all 4 open tenders →

Codes and neighbouring classes

The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division

Who buys
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name

Buyer type
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Other public bodies40%(38 notices)
    38 of 94 notices are Other public bodies (40%).
  • Central government34%(32 notices)
    32 of 94 notices are Central government (34%).
  • Local authorities9%(8 notices)
    8 of 94 notices are Local authorities (9%).
  • Not classified17%(16 notices)
    16 of 94 notices are Not classified (17%).
Contracting authorityTypeNoticesLast 12 monthsOpen now
NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITEDCentral government1482
Department for TransportCentral government1400
Rail Delivery GroupOther public bodies920
FIRST GREATER WESTERN LIMITEDOther public bodies700
FIRST TRANSPENNINE EXPRESS LIMITEDnot classified600
WM TRAINS LIMITEDOther public bodies440
TranslinkOther public bodies300
Transport for LondonOther public bodies310
Transport for the NorthOther public bodies300
ABELLIO EAST MIDLANDS LIMITEDnot classified200

32 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.

Where the work is delivered
i

Where the work on these notices is delivered.

Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.

Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.

Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 49 of 94 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region

RegionNoticesBids / lotSME winsLocal wins
West Midlands20 · 41%———
Greater London18 · 37%———
Yorkshire and the Humber17 · 35%———
North West England17 · 35%———
South East England16 · 33%———
South West England16 · 33%———
Scotland14 · 29%———
East Midlands13 · 27%———
North East England13 · 27%———
East of England11 · 22%———
Wales (Cymru)7 · 14%———
Northern Ireland3 · 6%———

Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.

How it is bought
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract90%(85 notices)
    85 of 94 notices are Contract (90%).
  • Framework10%(9 notices)
    9 of 94 notices are Framework (10%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published33%(31 notices)
    31 of 94 notices are Route not published (33%).
  • Direct award20%(19 notices)
    19 of 94 notices are Direct award (20%).
  • Open17%(16 notices)
    16 of 94 notices are Open (17%).
  • Limited / restricted16%(15 notices)
    15 of 94 notices are Limited / restricted (16%).
  • Selective14%(13 notices)
    13 of 94 notices are Selective (14%).
Threshold
i

How much of this market is above the legal threshold.

Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.

  • Above threshold62%(8 notices)
    8 of 13 notices are Above threshold (62%).
  • Below threshold38%(5 notices)
    5 of 13 notices are Below threshold (38%).
Typical tender window
i

How long bidders get to respond.

Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.

All notices we hold, not just recent ones.

28 daysrobust · n=13middle value, notice to deadline

Competition

Contracts published in the last 36 months (33) · bid counts per lot from award notices · values are net contract awards, framework and DPS ceilings excluded · SME and local status as declared

Contract value, net
i

The usual range of contract values here.

The middle half of published award values, VAT excluded, with the middle value marked. Framework ceilings are left out.

Published values, not actual spend.

p25 £151,200middle value £1,200,000p75 £2,209,700
interquartile range of 13 awards · p90 £4,490,864
Competed
i

How much of this market is actually put out to competition.

Notices run as an open or selective procedure, out of all notices that say which procedure was used. Direct awards count as not competed.

13 of 30 notices that state a procedure, last 36 months. 3 more give no procedure and are left out.

Last 36 months.

43%robust · n=30
Awards won by SMEs
i

What share of contracts go to small and medium firms.

Awards to a single supplier that declared its size. SME divided by all.

2 of 16 awards where the winner declared its size.

Last 36 months.

13%robust · n=16
Abandoned
i

How often a tender ends with no award.

Notices cancelled, withdrawn or marked unsuccessful, plus terminated ones that never got an award.

0 of 33 notices, last 36 months.

Only what buyers published. Tenders that quietly went nowhere are not counted.

Last 36 months.

0%robust · n=33

Who wins
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 32 awards to 26 suppliers · the five most frequent winners hold 55% of contract awards in the last 36 months

Where to submit
i

Where bids for this work are submitted.

Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.

E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 13 of 94 notices name one · each portal page explains registration

JAGGAER / BravoSolution6 notices · 46% · 2 open
Delta eSourcing3 notices · 23%
eTendersNI1 notices · 8%
Sell2Wales1 notices · 8%

Open tenders in railway transport services

4 open for bids now · soonest deadline first

NoticeAuthorityDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Operation of RIDC MeltonFrameworkNETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED25 Nov 202630d£29,386,811 ceiling
Rail Haulage3 lotsNETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED2 Dec 202638d£949,900,000

All 4 open notices with CPV 6020… →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 6020. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 23 Oct 2026.
  • Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
  • Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.