Lancaster University: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
Large organisation·Companies House: Royal Charter Company·Lancaster·North West England·Main market: Research services
Companies HouseRC000657 ↗
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Approved provider lists and panels this supplier is on.
Procedures where the same published amount is awarded to three or more suppliers: the total of the list, repeated on every place. Each list counts once in the total.
A place on a list is not money won. The total belongs to the whole list.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
22 awards (22 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 22 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
7311 Research services1 awards · 5% · awards naming a lot8051 Specialist training services1 awards · 5% · awards naming a lot9070 Environmental services1 awards · 5% · awards naming a lot9071 Environmental management1 awards · 5% · awards naming a lot9073 Pollution tracking and monitoring and rehabilitation1 awards · 5% · awards naming a loti
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
i
Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.
Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.
Based on 4 wins across all categories. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Lancashire Emotional Health & Wellbeing Service in Schools and Colleges | Lancashire County Council | — | — | £632,000 † |
| Operation & Management of Toxic Organic Micro Pollutants (TOMPs) Network (21-26) | Defra Network eTendering Portal | — | — | £542,825 † |
| Ru volatilisation PDRA | NATIONAL NUCLEAR LABORATORY LIMITED | — | — | £152,538 † |
| Research Services (Benchmarking the Value of XBRL and structured data in an AI-Driven Reporting Environment) | THE FINANCIAL REPORTING COUNCIL LIMITED | — | 4 mo | £67,500 † |
| Research Services into the use of artificial intelligence and other disruptive technologies in corporate reporting | THE FINANCIAL REPORTING COUNCIL LIMITED | — | 6 mo · up to 0.8 yrs | £64,065 † |
Where their buyers arei
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 17 of 17 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Bidding recordi
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
i
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 1 notices name this supplier, covering 3 lots since 21 Jul 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate
i
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
i
Frameworks and DPS this supplier got onto.
Lots appointed out of lots applied for. Kept apart from contract wins because almost every compliant bidder gets a place.
i
How many public bodies this supplier has bid to.
Buyers on notices that name it as a bidder, win or lose.
| Notice | Authority | Outcome | Bidders | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DN773311 Met Office Academic Partnership (MOAP) Science Delivery Framework 2 | Met Office | not appointed | 14 | 21 Jul 2026 |
Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Type not classified59%(13 awards)
13 of 22 awards are Type not classified (59%).Central government23%(5 awards)
5 of 22 awards are Central government (23%).Local authority14%(3 awards)
3 of 22 awards are Local authority (14%).Other public body5%(1 awards)
1 of 22 awards are Other public body (5%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Education England | 5 | 29.4% | 5 | 30 Mar 2023 |
| NATIONAL NUCLEAR LABORATORY LIMITED | 2 | 11.8% | 7 | 3 Mar 2026 |
| THE FINANCIAL REPORTING COUNCIL LIMITED | 2 | 11.8% | 2 | 17 Sept 2026 |
| Lancashire County Council | 1 | 5.9% | 1 | 7 Mar 2022 |
| Defra Network eTendering Portal | 1 | 5.9% | 1 | 1 Oct 2021 |
| Carmarthenshire County Council | 1 | 5.9% | 1 | 15 Jun 2026 |
| Low Pay Commission | 1 | 5.9% | 1 | 11 Mar 2026 |
| Department for Work & Pensions | 1 | 5.9% | 1 | 7 Jul 2026 |
Share = of the 17 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
9 of 22 awards carry an end date, 2 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| Research Services (Benchmarking the Value of XBRL and structured data in an AI-Driven Reporting Environment) | 27 Jan 2027 | £67,500 |
| Research into young people's experience of the labour market and minimum wages | 30 Mar 2027 | £34,968 |
| Soil Sampling Analysis in Cleddau Catchment (Phase 2 RePhoKus) | 31 Mar 2027 | £39,600 |
| Clean Energy | 11 Dec 2027 estimated | Not published |
Recent awards
Latest 22 of 22 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 7 of 22 awards, estimated from the published duration on 2 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.