Pacific Computers Limited: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMECompanies House: Private Limited CompanyBasingstokeNationwide (UK)Main market: Television and audio-visual equipment

Companies House03264034 ↗

Procedures with an award1114 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities11named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£381knet · on 2 of 14 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months3awards · 7 in the prior 24 months · last 27 Mar 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1end date on 11 of 14 awards · 1 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions8most often South East England
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.

An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.

Active awards, plus pending awards whose standstill has ended or was not published.

14 awards (14 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 14 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£381kOn 2 of 14 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Award vs estimate
i

Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.

Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.

Based on 1 wins in its industry (CPV division 32). Small sample.

A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.

21.3% above estimateindicative · n=1compared within CPV division 32
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
UoB Audio Visual: Supplies, System Design, Installation and MaintenanceUniversity of Bedfordshire——£242,500 †
Audio Visual Presentation, Collaboration & Video Conferencing SystemsORDNANCE SURVEY LIMITED——£138,291 †

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 11 of 11 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

South East England3 procedures · 27%
East of England2 procedures · 18%
North West England1 procedures · 9%
Yorkshire and the Humber1 procedures · 9%
East Midlands1 procedures · 9%
West Midlands1 procedures · 9%
Wales (Cymru)1 procedures · 9%
Scotland1 procedures · 9%

Bidding record
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 1 notices name this supplier since 23 Jul 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate

Contract lots contested
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

0 won · 0 lostFewer than three decided lots: no rate is claimed.
Framework / DPS places
i

Frameworks and DPS this supplier got onto.

Lots appointed out of lots applied for. Kept apart from contract wins because almost every compliant bidder gets a place.

0 of 1
Authorities bid for
i

How many public bodies this supplier has bid to.

Buyers on notices that name it as a bidder, win or lose.

1
NoticeAuthorityOutcomeBiddersPublished
IT Hardware Frameworkframework/DPSThe Police and Crime Commissioner for Northumbrianot appointed4123 Jul 2026

Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Type not classified36%(5 awards)
    5 of 14 awards are Type not classified (36%).
  • Education29%(4 awards)
    4 of 14 awards are Education (29%).
  • Local authority29%(4 awards)
    4 of 14 awards are Local authority (29%).
  • Central government7%(1 awards)
    1 of 14 awards are Central government (7%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Hampshire County Councilframework/DPS on 119.1%314 May 2025
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Boardframework/DPS on 119.1%227 Mar 2026
University of Bedfordshire19.1%111 Jul 2024
ORDNANCE SURVEY LIMITED19.1%125 Nov 2020
South & City College Birminghamframework/DPS on 119.1%131 Aug 2024
NEUPC Ltdframework/DPS on 119.1%11 Oct 2024
Offshore Renewable Energy Catapultframework/DPS on 119.1%16 Jan 2021
enFrame CICframework/DPS on 119.1%13 Oct 2022

Share = of the 11 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

11 of 14 awards carry an end date, 7 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent awards

Latest 14 of 14 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Lot 3a. End User Services (lower value and complexity)Government Commercial Agency1 Dec 2025£480,000,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 194 appointed suppliers
Audio Visual ServicesBetsi Cadwaladr University Health BoardNot published£200,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 5 appointed suppliers
Integrated SolutionsBetsi Cadwaladr University Health BoardNot published£200,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 22 appointed suppliers
Lot 2 – Supply, Delivery and Installation of Audio Visual Equipment and Associated ServicesSouth & City College BirminghamNot published£64,700,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 9 appointed suppliers
Supply of Audio Solutions - Direct DeliveryHampshire County CouncilNot published£364,375 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 13 appointed suppliers
Supply of Interactive Solutions - Direct DeliveryHampshire County CouncilNot published£1,093,125 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 14 appointed suppliers
Maintenance of Audio Visual SolutionsHampshire County CouncilNot published£707,500 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 12 appointed suppliers
Design, Supply, Installation and Maintenance of Audio Visual Systems : Regional Coverage (up to 5 of the regional areas)NEUPC LtdNot published£80,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 8 appointed suppliers
Supply of Audio-Visual SolutionsKent County CouncilNot publishedNot published
UoB Audio Visual: Supplies, System Design, Installation and MaintenanceUniversity of BedfordshireNot published£242,500 †
from the contract notice
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 4 of 14 awards, estimated from the published duration on 7 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.