Synnovis Analytics LLP: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Companies House: Limited Liability PartnershipLondonNationwide (UK)Main market: Hospital and related services

Companies HouseOC392043 ↗

Procedures with an award910 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities6named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£293knet · on 5 of 10 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months6awards · 1 in the prior 24 months · last 12 Jun 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months5end date on 7 of 10 awards · 1 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions4most often Yorkshire and the Humber
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.

An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.

Active awards, plus pending awards whose standstill has ended or was not published.

10 awards (10 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 10 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

8511 Hospital and related services6 awards · 60% · awards naming a lot
7190 Laboratory services1 award · 10% · awards naming a lot
8514 Miscellaneous health services1 award · 10% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£293kOn 5 of 10 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i

What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

£37k middle valuerobust · n=5
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Workflow for NHS Lab delivering SCID Evaluation - SPOTitNHS England——£136,000 †
Blood Sciences laboratory referral.Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust—1 yrs£60,000 †
≈ £60k/yr
Immunology referral testingCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust—1 yrs£36,667 †
≈ £37k/yr
Histopathology Pathology referred samplesSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust—1 yrs£30,000 †
≈ £30k/yr
DON - Chemistry Pathology referred samples 26/27Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust—1 yrs£30,000 †
≈ £30k/yr

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 9 of 9 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

Yorkshire and the Humber4 procedures · 44%
East of England3 procedures · 33%
West Midlands1 procedure · 11%
Greater London1 procedure · 11%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Central government40%(4 awards)
    4 of 10 awards are Central government (40%).
  • NHS & health40%(4 awards)
    4 of 10 awards are NHS & health (40%).
  • Type not classified20%(2 awards)
    2 of 10 awards are Type not classified (20%).

Share = of the 9 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

7 of 10 awards carry an end date, 3 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent awards

Latest 10 of 10 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Pathology Referral TestingHealthTrust Europe LLP (HTE) acting as agent for the University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust (“UHCW”)Not published£65,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 6 appointed suppliers
Diagnostic Service SolutionsHealthTrust Europe LLP (HTE) acting as agent for the University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust (“UHCW”)Not published£260,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 32 appointed suppliers
DON - Chemistry Pathology referred samples 26/27Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNot published£30,000 †
from the contract notice
Histopathology Pathology referred samplesSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNot published£30,000 †
from the contract notice
Immunology referral testingCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNot published£36,667 †
from the contract notice
CALL OFF ORDER FOR SENDAWAY TESTSIntegrated Laboratory Solutions LLPNot publishedNot published
Call off contract for Biochemistry/Toxicology TestsIntegrated Laboratory Solutions LLPNot publishedNot published
Blood Sciences laboratory referral.Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNot published£60,000 †
from the contract notice
Workflow for NHS Lab delivering SCID Evaluation - SPOTitNHS EnglandNot published£136,000 †
from the contract notice
Sendaway test for the Pathology departmentWest Suffolk NHS Foundation TrustNot published£575,105 †
joint award · 6 suppliers
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 4 of 10 awards, estimated from the published duration on 3 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.