Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentEast MidlandsLincoln

Official UK PPONPYGP-2439-CCHGWebsitelpft.nhs.uk ↗

Open now2next deadline 2 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months17+325% vs prior 12 months (4)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share20%of 20 awarded procedures · 19 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

20 awarded tenders, 19 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months72 within 6 months · 1 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£4.5mnet · on 14 of 14 published values · top 5 = 92%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

2 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 21 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(21 notices)
    21 of 21 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award29%(6 notices)
    6 of 21 notices are Direct award (29%).
  • Limited / restricted29%(6 notices)
    6 of 21 notices are Limited / restricted (29%).
  • Open24%(5 notices)
    5 of 21 notices are Open (24%).
  • Route not published14%(3 notices)
    3 of 21 notices are Route not published (14%).
  • Selective5%(1 notice)
    1 of 21 notices is Selective (5%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3.5indicative · n=20% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 21 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

02 of 21 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
SHINE Lincolnshire210%22—
Turning Point15%1225 Jun 2025
Recornect BV15%1211 Jun 2025
DFP Services Ltd15%11—
Chores Hygiene Management Ltd15%11—
InterOperability Health (UK) Limited15%11—
Britplas Fabrications Limited15%11—
Nattergal Limited15%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 20% of 20 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 19 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£4.5mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 14 of 14 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 92%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£59k middle valuerobust · n=14Middle half £22k–£230k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Adult Mental Health Stepdown Services - PilotTurning Point—2 yrs · up to 3 yrs£1,500,000 †
≈ £750k/yr
Peer Support Workers Service - INTENTION TO AWARD NOTICE PSR Direct Award process CSHINE Lincolnshire——£1,442,289 †
Staff Attack systemsDFP Services Ltd——£800,000 †
Patient focussed multi-media unitsRecornect BV—1.8 yrs£271,795 †
≈ £155k/yr
Ash Villa Back-Up GeneratorWB Power Services Limited—4 mo£104,910 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

16 of 20 contracts carry an end date, 3 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 30 of 30 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Ashley House - Step Down AccommodationSocial work and related servicesPlanned21 Oct 2024—
Open Dialogue Training and DevelopmentEducation and training servicesAwarded / complete9 Nov 2023£90,000
Patient Safety and Risk Management SolutionSoftware package and information systemsOpen2 Aug 2023—
Pharmacy Services for LPFT/LCHS and LiSHPharmacy servicesOpen8 Nov 2022£2,000,000
Cloud Contact CentreIT services: consultingOpen6 Jul 2021£60,000
Crisis HousingCommunity health servicesAwarded / complete30 Jun 2021—
Cowin UnitsComputer equipment and suppliesAwarded / complete27 Apr 2021—
Oxyhealth vision based patient monitoring and management systemsIndustry specific software packageAwarded / complete26 Apr 2021—

Search all 30 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 16 of 20 published contracts have an end date; 3 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.